[DX-CHAT] VU4/VU3CHE report 2

2006-04-21 Thread Charles Harpole
Friday afternoon over here in VU4 Did some shopping while bands were filled with other VU4ANs I will continue to try mostly WARC bands. The new ROOF on Hotel Sinclairs is very slippery and steep... big change from Dec 2004 when it was ideal So ants will not be tweeked... hi hi. We

[DX-CHAT] Gentlemen hams

2006-04-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Folks, Yes, that is the type of guy you hope you don't meet in traffic on the day the handgun is under his seat! I don't see the problem as "dumbing down" of the exams. It seems more of a problem that the tests don't cover the right stuff. The basics are missing. New hams have the chance to

Re: [DX-CHAT] VU4/VU3RWO

2006-04-21 Thread Peter W2IRT
At 08:44 04/21/06, Bill Hawkins wrote: Bring on BS7. For that one, bring on some sunspots first, please! Mind you, if it stays inactive much longer, global warming will solve the BS7 problem for us once and for all - Peter W2IRT Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems

Re: [DX-CHAT] Gentlemen HAM'S

2006-04-21 Thread wn3vaw
I would have to respectfully disagree with Norm's comment that years ago intentional QRM was almost unheard of. It may not have been at the level that you seen nowadays, but it's always been there. I can still recall one evening in college (about 30 years ago... *sigh*), when a bunch of us

Re: [DX-CHAT] Gentlemen HAM'S

2006-04-21 Thread Zack Widup
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can still recall one evening in college (about 30 years ago... *sigh*), when a bunch of us were operating K3CR on 20 phone, when a small pile-up developed (don't ask me why, we weren't a special event, just a college club station, and a

Re: [DX-CHAT] Gentlemen HAM'S

2006-04-21 Thread Barry
Years ago there was no DX Cluster network that announced to the world the instant the rare DX appeared and on what frequency. Also, in the old days, there was no implied guarantee of a QSO, or multiple band-mode QSOs, with each DXpedition. You had to tune, tune tune, be in the right place at

[DX-CHAT] More VU4 In The Future?

2006-04-21 Thread k8qm
All, I was rather disappointed that the various groups weren't able to try and make a more cohesive effort during this short opening. They probably could have had fewer but better equipped stations and had more luck giving all the deserving at least one QSO while minimizing the guys who have

Re: [DX-CHAT] More VU4 In The Future?

2006-04-21 Thread Peter W2IRT
At 11:10 04/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, I was rather disappointed that the various groups weren't able to try and make a more cohesive effort during this short opening. More effort?? Are you *kidding*? Last night alone there were three different stations easily workable from the

Re: [DX-CHAT] Gentlemen HAM'S

2006-04-21 Thread Norm Gertz
Ron..my recollections of behaviour were of the time periods in the late 30's up until WWII.. After resumption of amateur radio activities following the war intentional QRM seemed to grow in frequency and in intensity. Vulgar language was unheard of in those early days. Poor operators in

[DX-CHAT] W3UR

2006-04-21 Thread nick cominos
Prop to 9 land this evening, and Bernie's signal, were magnificent. Solid strength 9 even through the jamming. Thank you Bernie, two more to go. vy 73, Nick W9UM Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only,