As far as I know the 7O1YGF-group have no documentation
to turn in...
7O1A did send in documentation but was not approved as
a good one.
73/DX de Osten SM5DQC[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Bernie McClenny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Joel Magid' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Jim
Anyone who was with the 7O1YGF team read this forum and care to comment?
Joel
-Original Message-
From: Osten B Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jan 26, 2006 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Joel Magid' [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Jim Reisert AD1C'
[EMAIL PROTECTED], dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject:
WISH SOMEONE WOULD COMMENT FROM THE GROUP... and send in
some papers WHY.??
because like most i tore my guts out trying to work them on the low bands
and did.!!!
David VK3EW
At 05:36 AM 27/01/2006, you wrote:
Anyone who was with the 7O1YGF
team read this forum and care to comment?
Joel
For what it's worth...
We last discussed the 7O1YGF situation, just shy of a year ago. I had a
private reply from someone high up in the League (no, sorry, I'm not at
liberty to say who... and yes, that person would know, they're still lurking
on this reflector) in response to one of my reply
Well that's an interesting question. About 5 years agoG3VMW and myselfbroached the idea of going to activate T5. I called the ARRL DXCC desk to ask then directly what evidence of permission we'd need. The conversation was a bit comical and went rather like this:G0OIL: "Who needs to provide
Jim
I think ARRL policy on this subject has been written rather clear in the ARRL
DX Bulletin 32 from August 12, 2004:
“Operations approved for DXCC credit: Effective immediately, the
ARRL DXCC Branch will accept QSLs for operation taking place in the
Somaliland (northwestern Somalia) and
Jim,
Great question and when they (ARRL) determine the answer they should apply
the set of rule to 7O1YGF :)
Joel W1JMM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Jim Reisert AD1C
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 3:46 PM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject:
