: HK3CW
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Continuous callers
Nobody has addressed the opposite side of the coin: Incessant callers calling
CQ TEST without giving a chance for people wanting a qso to break their
non-stop calling
*Subject:* Re: [DX-CHAT] Continuous callers
Nobody has addressed the opposite side of the coin: Incessant
callers calling CQ TEST without giving a chance for people
wanting a qso to break their non-stop calling.. those are also
annoying...
I also enjoyed the 65 WPM
, thanks to my QSK. Only
the real loudenboomers were getting through.
Dave W7AQK
- Original Message -
From: Mecseri
To: radiodave.g4...@tiscali.co.uk
Cc: cwd...@gmail.com ; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 5:29 AM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Continuous callers
I noticed a few of those during the contest. What I found interesting is that it would be an almost continuous, non-stop CQ for a few minutes (most 4 -5, some as many as 10)... and then all of a sudden, there'd be a pause and then they'd hear and work you.
Let's call this what it is: A sneaky,
No Ron, it is not a violation of Part 97, specifically 97.113. Perfectly
legal and not a violation of any contest rules either. Some Other countries
do have limits on transmission length though but even those are akin to blue
laws since they were designed for the cw only era. It may violate
_
From: Ryan Jairam [mailto:rjai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:17 PM
To: wn3...@verizon.net
Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Continuous callers
No Ron, it is not a violation of Part 97, specifically 97.113. Perfectly
legal and not a violation of any
[mailto:rjai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:17 PM
To: wn3...@verizon.net
Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Continuous callers
No Ron, it is not a violation of Part 97, specifically 97.113. Perfectly
legal and not a violation of any contest rules either. Some Other
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Continuous callers
No Ron, it is not a violation of Part 97, specifically 97.113. Perfectly
legal and not a violation of any contest rules either. Some Other countries
do have limits on transmission length though but even those are akin to blue
laws since they were
...@verizon.net
Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Continuous callers
Believe it or not while you hear continuous calling, I hear a short
pause in between. I send out my call and they usually come back. So
I'm not entirely convinced that people simply leave the computer CQing
and don't listen
