[DX-CHAT] re:lotw

2004-04-20 Thread Kz2i
oh, i agree with you scott. lotw will be the way to go. i wouldn't have loaded 32,000 q's if i didn't think so. it's eqsl that i don't understand. as far as i know, no major awards support it - or plan to. i think even the cq awards (and we all know the history between arrl and cq) will

Re: [DX-CHAT] re:lotw

2004-04-20 Thread Mike(W5UC) Kathy(K5MWH) Watson
Well said Steve. There is an elongated discussion in progress on another forum about domestic QSLs and a participant in that discussion asked if there is any form of domestic QSL bureau, to which I reply YES!! It's called LOTW. In my opinion, LOTW is the greatest thing since canned beer( sliced

[DX-CHAT] LoTW concerns

2004-04-20 Thread Charles Harpole
[:dx-chat:] I have watched a fellow ham and computer expert labor to insert my logs into LoTW. As someone who does not know what that ham is doing, I can still observe the great number of careful steps he has had to take and he knows what he is doing. He has put in about 8 hours so far and