Good evening,
Just an administrative reminder concerning thge increasing use of
"register" addresses.
I am seeing more and more of these (this was received this
evening..the names have been changed to protect the guilty):
"I apologize for this automatic reply to your email.
To control spam, I
Speak for yourself. I plan to live forever! (Unless one of my girlfirends
catches me with one of my other girlfriends... >:-}
73 de Fred K2FRD
At 17:49 -0400 04/04/2006, Bill Barr wrote:
>Sure it will happen again in 2106, 3006, etc.! Maybe not in our life time!
>
>Bill N4NX
Subscribe/unsubscr
Sure it will happen again in 2106, 3006, etc.! Maybe not in our life time!
Bill N4NX
- Original Message -
From: "Steve-KF2TI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Steve Adell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Steve Adell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 17:32 04/04/06, George McCrary wrote:
Every hundred isn't it?
Hehe - Yeah. Realized just after I sent it.
- Peter
W2IRT
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT reflector
At 16:00 04/04/06, Steve-KF2TI wrote:
01:02:03 04/05/06.
That won't ever happen again
Well, actually it will (only once in our lifetimes, however). It will
happen for any country outside the United states at the same time of
day on the 4th of May of this year (d/m/y instead
HAS ANYONE RECEIVED A QSL FROM HL4HL
W8HXX
Thought you might like to know this--right up there with Y2K
On Wednesday of this week, at two minutes and three seconds after
1:00 in the morning, the time and date will be
01:02:03 04/05/06.
That won't ever happen again.
You may now return to your normal stuff.***From
Jack is correct on the HN-31 duty cycle and power. And, I've just
discovered that the FULL warranty on my HN-31 "Cantenna" (90 days) expired
on 10 June 1970. Isn't that the way of things.
vy 73,
Nick W9UM
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a me
The specs I read where out of the Heath manual...
They offer 2 very different key down times using what they are calling
transformer oil and mineral oil.
At 11:17 AM 4/4/2006 -0700, Jim Lux wrote:
At 09:22 AM 4/4/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Is anyone familiar enough with the HN-31 Heathkit
According to the manual the HN-31 is rated at 1kw.
Duty cycle is 10 minutes using transformer oil & about 2 minutes using
mineral oil
Check with your local power company. If you go to the facility that
handles the transformers you can usually get a fill up at no charge.
At 09:22 AM 4/4/2006
I remember the question came up in the 80s or so. The response at that time
was that the only permissible way to do it was to have someone visit your
station and work the expedition using your callsign and station. Mind you
this was a quarter century ago before ham radio went nuts!
To
Is anyone familiar enough with the HN-31 Heathkit Dummy Load (History Lesson)to
know how much power you can run to this thing in other than "key down". I don't
know if it has transformer oil or Mineral Oil in it. Will it handle 1500W on a
50% duty cycle for a short time?? Does anyone know where
As I understand the situation (and I could be wrong!), since the control
operator is not in the same DXCC entity as the remote controlled station, the
RC station would not be considered acceptable for DXCC purposes.
Therefore, it would not be valid for DXCC for anyone.
Or am I wrong folks?
73
My one wish in this regard is that if they ever re-vamp the DXCC
rules, some form of credit could go to the operator(s) for the entity
worked, as a courtesy. I'd hate to miss a once-in-a-lifetime chance
to travel to a remote entity just because I don't have them on any band.
-Original Me
Now you're invoking the DSTC (Disruptive Space Time Continuum) Principle which
states that a person can exist in two separate dimensions at the same time.
This Principle is often applied on incoming QSL cards when someone (1) lists a
time of contact when you were sound asleep and obviously not o
Not valid for you? Or not valid for either you or your unsuspecting QSO
partner as well?
73, Jerry K3BZ
- Original Message -
From: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:37 PM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Working yourself on DXPeditions
Um, yes, bu
It would appear that the issuing authorities are using VU4AN as the prefix, as
opposed to simply VU4.
But what the hey, the important point is that you guys ARE getting the licenses
and ARE getting proper permission to operate... personally, so long as it's a
valid license issued by the VU auth
17 matches
Mail list logo
