,...)
R.S.
Bosnia Herzegovina
- Original Message -
From: david miller
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 7:45 PM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] 7O and the ARRL
The ARRL can be quite vague or to the point when asked what they will accept
as sufficient proof of operation
when none has
been submitted, despite repeated requests!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of david miller
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 1:46 PM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] 7O and the ARRL
The ARRL can be quite vague
At 01:46 PM 8/11/2007, Goran Arezina wrote:
Not too long ago somebody wrote: I just worked it, and I do not
care if ARRL accept it as OK or not! Fu*k them, I did it .
Really? Are you sure it wasn't a pirate? Do you have proof that you
worked them? Was the operation approved by the
I understand why dxcc can not pre-judge any one operation for validation for
dxcc credit. have to wait until the op is actually done.
HOWEVER, surely dxcc could tell what kind of documentation is necessary from
any one entity or another, and be able to name the local official who will
Before anyone else's temper flares up on 7O1YGF, let's all remember one key
fact:
The DXCC Desk can't approve the operation. Not won't; can't.
Why? Simple: The 7O1YGF team never submitted anything.
In past years, I've had a lot of talks at Dayton and via email with various
people connected
