Can't really comment until I read the thing... but this sure sounds like the
arguments going on over on QRZ.COM (where you're either against the ARRL, or
either naieve or aa shill for them, according to the most vocal posters).
I hope Rich isn't simply rehasing that trash talk. I've always thought
better of him.
Has anything specific been mentioned, or is it the usual nameless and
faceless ARRL staffers to blame?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Warren
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 10:15 PM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] CQ Magazine Editorial
Interesting editorial by Rich W2VU on P8 of December CQ Magazine.
Topic is Regulation-by-Bandwidth, and the (alleged) way the ARRL
Board is using IARU Region II to make a fast end run around U.S.
amateurs and the FCC after their first approach drew little support.
I find Rich's argument persuasive. Any thoughts, comments - or rebuttal ?
John, NT5C.
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org
