[DX-CHAT] Re: 7O1YGF

2009-08-13 Thread John Warren


On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Zack Widup W9SZ wrote:

My understanding was that they had some documentation but it was  
thought that their license or OK to operate was issued by a regional  
authority - sort of like the state of Illinois issuing me a license  
instead of the FCC.


That was more-or-less my understanding too Zack.  Their operation was  
approved (in writing ?) by the office in Aden, but was subsequently  
disavowed by the head office in the capital Sana'a.  Not wanting to  
burn its bridges for future amateur radio activities, ARRL/DXCC  
reluctantly supported Sana'a.  However, I think there have been cases  
where ARRL accepted less than a national license - What about the  
scouts in 3V8 ?


Perhaps one day Bill will feel free to tell us if we have that right.

7O1A, the operation by Franz DJ9ZB and Zorro, is the one that  
frustrates me. So far as I know, there is no geographic issue - they  
were there. But what sort of approval did they have? It's the only 7O  
I have worked on 40M SSB, and there doesn't seem to be any move toward  
it counting.


John,  NT5C.



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 


unsubscribe dx-chat

or 


subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



Re: [DX-CHAT] Re: 7O1YGF

2009-08-13 Thread DAVE WHITE
 
My understanding is that Franz and Zorro had authorisation from the Aden 
office, not from Sana'a.  Given the dubious authorisatoins that some people got 
away with, I'd always thohgh that the 7O1A guys got a bit of a raw deal.  
However, I'm not in a position to know about whatever games of politics were 
going on in the background.

Cynics may say that if you want instant authorisation from ARRL, then take 
OH2BH or one of their other pals with you.  But I'm not a cynic, of 
course...

73
Dave G0OIL

--- On Thu, 13/8/09, John Warren n...@texas.net wrote:

From: John Warren n...@texas.net
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Re: 7O1YGF
To: dx-chat dx-chat dx-chat@njdxa.org
Date: Thursday, 13 August, 2009, 7:01 PM


On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Zack Widup W9SZ wrote:

 My understanding was that they had some documentation but it was thought that 
 their license or OK to operate was issued by a regional authority - sort of 
 like the state of Illinois issuing me a license instead of the FCC.

That was more-or-less my understanding too Zack.  Their operation was approved 
(in writing ?) by the office in Aden, but was subsequently disavowed by the 
head office in the capital Sana'a.  Not wanting to burn its bridges for future 
amateur radio activities, ARRL/DXCC reluctantly supported Sana'a.  However, I 
think there have been cases where ARRL accepted less than a national license - 
What about the scouts in 3V8 ?

Perhaps one day Bill will feel free to tell us if we have that right.

7O1A, the operation by Franz DJ9ZB and Zorro, is the one that frustrates me. So 
far as I know, there is no geographic issue - they were there. But what sort of 
approval did they have? It's the only 7O I have worked on 40M SSB, and there 
doesn't seem to be any move toward it counting.

John,  NT5C.



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org
In the message body put either
unsubscribe dx-chat

or
subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---