[DX-CHAT] LBOTW

2007-08-27 Thread Ragnar Otterstad
And more important, it is controlled by the ARRL., who are NOT friends of Amateur radio. John - W2AGN With respect: Nonsense ! Rag LA5HELife member Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only,

RE: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW

2007-08-27 Thread Ron Notarius W3WN
It is your choice John, whether or not to join, or even like the League. But to make such an inflammatory comment... what facts do you have to back up that opinion? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of W2AGN Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 10:23 PM

Re: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW

2007-08-27 Thread Mike(W5UC) Kathy(K5MWH)
At 09:22 PM 8/26/2007, you wrote: And more important, it is controlled by the ARRL., who are NOT friends of Amateur radio. John - W2AGN John, just WHO DO you consider a friend of amateur radio. In your response, please limit your discussion to the organization that IS a friend of amateur

Re: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW

2007-08-27 Thread Mike(W5UC) Kathy(K5MWH)
At 07:52 AM 8/27/2007, you wrote: Sadly, there is no such organization. That makes the ARRL no less of a tax-exempt publishing house, trying to make money off the shhep that will follow them anywhere. -- John - W2AGN John, that is exactly correct, and that is the reason I phrased my

Re[2]: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW

2007-08-27 Thread Art RX9TX
Hello W2AGN, W And more important, it is controlled by the ARRL., who are NOT W friends of Amateur radio. W John - W2AGN At least, they do save my efforts and money, unlike of... -- 73...Art RX9TX http://rx9tx.qrz.ru Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems

Re[2]: [DX-CHAT] Postal thieves

2007-08-27 Thread Art RX9TX
Hello Charles, CH I have a USA mail drop... my son receives my mail that comes to CH his and my USA address, 4301 Jenkins Dr, Plano, and he CH periodically sends my mail to me Last month he spent $148 usd CH to send me a slim FedEx box So is that why you want _us_ to

Re: [DX-CHAT] Postal thieves

2007-08-27 Thread Mike(W5UC) Kathy(K5MWH)
At 07:47 PM 8/26/2007, Charles Harpole wrote: I have a USA mail drop... my son receives my mail that comes to his and my USA address, 4301 Jenkins Dr, Plano, and he periodically sends my mail to me Last month he spent $148 usd to send me a slim FedEx box and reports US post is also

Re: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW

2007-08-27 Thread W2AGN
Ron Notarius W3WN wrote: It is your choice John, whether or not to join, or even like the League. But to make such an inflammatory comment... what facts do you have to back up that opinion? 1. Their recent attempt at Regulation by Bandwidth which was a transparent attempt to make more room

Re: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW

2007-08-27 Thread Zack Widup
I wonder if the people making anti-ARRL statements have even bothered to talk to any of the ARRL officials? And if not, why not? I met Joel W5ZN at the Dayton VHF banquet last year (2006). What a great guy! I've had numerous chats with Dave K1ZZ. I always seem to cross paths with my

Re: [DX-CHAT] LoTW

2007-08-27 Thread Osten B Magnusson
I have been thinking (it happens...) and I am going to upload the 9Q1EK and 9Q1TB logs to LoTW. I have there before the logs for my own calls and also ZK1EQL and CU2/SM7EQL. There is a reason (beside busted calls which often happens due to the QRN in Kinshasa): I have worked almost all the DX

[DX-CHAT] ZD9BCB

2007-08-27 Thread John Warren
Does anyone have an e-mail address for Brian, ZD9BCB ? I'm familiar with his operation at the upper end of 20M SSB around 1700Z, but that's not a good place to discuss a possible low-band sked. But I suspect any internet link on Gough Island is probably via Inmarsat, so very expensive for any

Re: [DX-CHAT] just had to answr

2007-08-27 Thread Osten B Magnusson
Correction: My XYL passed away in 2002, not in 2008... Here is the e-mail again, edited: I have been thinking (it happens...) and I am going to upload the 9Q1EK and 9Q1TB logs to LoTW. I have there before the logs for my own calls and also ZK1EQL and CU2/SM7EQL. There is a reason (beside

Re: [DX-CHAT] Postal thieves

2007-08-27 Thread john
At 10:15 AM 8/27/2007, Mike(W5UC) Kathy(K5MWH) wrote: At 07:47 PM 8/26/2007, Charles Harpole wrote: I have a USA mail drop... my son receives my mail that comes to his and my USA address, 4301 Jenkins Dr, Plano, and he periodically sends my mail to me Last month he spent $148 usd to send

[DX-CHAT] A How to QSL statement--final version

2007-08-27 Thread Charles Harpole
SUCCESSFUL QSLing de HS0ZCW Steps in sending a direct QSL to a DX station: 1. Obtain correct address via qrz.com or use the GO List for QSL manager addresses, or search the Web via Google. 2. Consult the DX station’s web site or web information for special instructions (such as “direct only,”

RE: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW

2007-08-27 Thread Ron Notarius W3WN
OK, well, let's see here: (1) Regulation by bandwith. Poorly written, poorly explained, IMHO, something I did mention to my Division Director prior to the petition withdrawl. I think that the intent of the petition was to (a) allow US amateurs the flexibility that amateurs in most of the rest

[DX-CHAT] Addition: A How to QSL statement--final version

2007-08-27 Thread Osten B Magnusson
I wrote this below, and what I meant was that : If you send a QSL to manager, there should not be any need to read the K4VUD statement. You have to trust that the QSL-manager is not completely stupid! Also, I want to add that mail theft is really not as usual as many think - I have mailed

RE: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW

2007-08-27 Thread john
At 06:19 PM 8/27/2007, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote: If you don't like the way things are going, you're going to have to do more than kvetch on a reflector. Right. You can vote with your feet, as I have after many yrs of supporting the league. John K5MO Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback,

Re: [DX-CHAT] A How to QSL statement--final version (Addendum)

2007-08-27 Thread Mike(W5UC) Kathy(K5MWH)
At 05:44 PM 8/27/2007, Barry wrote: Successful QSLing de W2UP 1. If a DX station has a reputation for not returning cards or blaming postal theft for non-QSLing, or has a long list of inane rules to follow, don't waste your time or money. There will always be someone else to work who

RE: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW

2007-08-27 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
There's a very simple solution. If and when a replacement for the Regulation by Bandwith petition is submitted, just include an exception limiting private mailbox robots (be they PACTOR III or anything else) to a small sub-band segment. The Headquarters decision makers will never stand

[DX-CHAT] qrm via data etc.?

2007-08-27 Thread Charles Harpole
To W4TV et al.. Slo scan tv ops on 14.230 + -, QRMs anyone on ssb that comes up there and it is on purpose and regularily practiced. Sounds like u are saying we are in for more of the same in another mode and with more legality behind it. Correct? Oh, well.. 73 BTW, if the

RE: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW

2007-08-27 Thread Ron Notarius W3WN
Well Joe, I have NOT said it ain't so so I'm not sure what denials you're talking about. It sounds like a determined number of the committee pushed their own agenda through. And based on the complaints that I've seen about the way some of these semi-automatic stations have been running, this was

RE: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW

2007-08-27 Thread Ron Notarius W3WN
OK... before we go too far astray, let's get this thread back on track here. The issue of the thread is Use, or lack thereof, of Logbook of the World, and why or why not. Delving into the reasons why many are unhappy or worse with ARRL HQ is another subject, and frankly, it really does not

[Fwd: RE: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW]

2007-08-27 Thread Bud Morin
Thank you, Ron, for telling it like it is!! Bud Morin, K9ZT Original Message Subject:RE: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:19:12 -0400 From: Ron Notarius W3WN [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dx-chat@njdxa.org OK, well, let's