*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1915695 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915695
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1915695
[MIR] libayatana-appindicator
--
You received this bug notification
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libayatana-
appindicator/+bug/1770146/comments/14. This is still invalid. Please
don't reopen without a new rationale.
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770146
Title:
[MIR] libayatana-appindicator
Status in
[Expired for libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770146
Title:
[MIR] libayatana-appindicator
Status in
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770146
Title:
[MIR] libayatana-appindicator
Status in
[Expired for libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug
Desktop team NAKed maintaining it, and it looks like reverse-
dependencies would need changes (and for one, having written the nm-
applet patch, I rather this be removed to use standard status icon code
than appindicators). Setting to Incomplete.
If this needs to be in main to support software,
nothing to do here for 18.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770146
Title:
[MIR] libayatana-appindicator
Status in libayatana-appindicator package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug
Are they 100% compatible? Can you switch between both without loosing
any functionality? Will end user notice switch?
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/network-manager-applet/blob/master/configure.ac#L167
network-manager-applet now support both and I doubt that someone tests all
indicators -
It was pointed some cycles ago that going with an hostile fork and
making it incompatible with the existing implementation would complicate
any transition and the adoption of the new stack, seems that's where we
are. Speaking from a Desktop perspective that's a transition that isn't
going to bring
A ping from one of the upstream maintainers of Ayatana Indicators.
For Debian I maintain this wiki page that documents the transition
status. There is still a lot of work ahead in Debian:
https://wiki.debian.org/Ayatana/IndicatorsTransition
Anyone chiming in (ideally on the Debian side) is
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770146
Title:
[MIR] libayatana-appindicator
Status in
@khurshid-alam, the problem is stuff in main that depends on ayatana,
and can't migrate until the archive is self-consistent.
I'm not asking to transition universe to ayatana (it can take all the
time needed, if somebody does the work), but rather asking to move
ayatana to main and appindicator
Appindicator is dead ? Since when? Ubuntu and all other variants use it.
Unity uses it. I fear deprecating libappindicator in favor of
libayatana-appindicator won't be easy task in unity and Gnome. In-fact
it's a huge task for Unity. But since both library can co-exist I don't
really see a problem
What is difference between libappindicator and libayatana-appindicator?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770146
Title:
[MIR] libayatana-appindicator
Status in
** Description changed:
[Availability]
* Everywhere
[Rationale]
* Appindicator is dead, we should move it to universe and switch to the
"better" and "supported" ayatana version
[Security]
* No security bugs found
[Quality assurance]
* Strongly maintained in Debian, lots of
Laney, do you think the current appindicator team can subscribe here
too?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770146
Title:
[MIR] libayatana-appindicator
Status in
missing bug subscriber
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug
>Why does this require a MIR? It doesn't seem like there are any packages
>depending on it, in any
flavour. Whether libappindicator FTBFS or not has no bearing on this.
please look at cosmic-proposed, thanks.
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
Why does this require a MIR? It doesn't seem like there are any packages
depending on it, in any flavour. Whether libappindicator FTBFS or not
has no bearing on this.
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
I'm subscribing also “Indicator Applet Developers” team so they can
provide some inputs on this if they want (and maybe subscribe to this
new one?)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug report.
22 matches
Mail list logo
