Re: [Dx4win] DX4WIN v9.0.2.1134

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Tony Brock-Fisher via DX4WIN wrote: > I just tried that. It ignores the ADIF 'COMMENT' field so no call signs come > thru... I could add this as an option (Operator ADIF field => Notes for this QSO). Tony, please send me your log. I

Re: [Dx4win] DX4WIN v9.0.2.1134

Paul gave me this same answer directly. I tried it and it works perfectly! So somewhere between v407 and v9 the import was changed to import 'COMMENT' to the 'Notes for this Call'. But changing the ADIF tag to 'NOTES' results in the data coming into the 'Notes for this QSO' field as before.

Re: [Dx4win] DX4WIN v9.0.2.1134

If you export a qso with something in notes field, you will see what is needed to edit. I did it for you. So a qso in adif is something like this 20171126 054500 6Y0W 1.82480 6Y0 82 NA CW 160m 599 599 8 NA-097 N Y 20171127 Y 20171127 LZ1NK SV1DPI So you need to add your call in and it

Re: [Dx4win] DX4WIN v9.0.2.1134

I just tried that. It ignores the ADIF 'COMMENT' field so no call signs come thru... -Tony On 11/28/2017 4:25 PM, Mike Cizek W0VTT wrote: Hello Tony, Have you tried using AD1C's utility ADIF to DXQ? I haven't needed this specific function, but I think it will do what you need. Free

Re: [Dx4win] DX4WIN v9.0.2.1134

...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tony Brock-Fisher via DX4WIN Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 15:21 To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Dx4win] DX4WIN v9.0.2.1134 Hello- I recently upgraded from v4.07 to 9.0.2.1134. It has some changed behavior and I'd like

[Dx4win] DX4WIN v9.0.2.1134

Hello- I recently upgraded from v4.07 to 9.0.2.1134. It has some changed behavior and I'd like to get some help. Mostly I am a contester. For contesting, I use N1MM+ logger. After the contest, I export the log in ADIF from N1MM+ and import it to DX4WIN. I am interested in certain awards