AW: [Dx4win] Differing ADIF formats

2005-03-12 Thread Sauvageot Christoph
2005 14:17 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; DX4WIN Reflector Betreff: Re: [Dx4win] Differing ADIF formats I wonder if it follows, then, that DX4WIN simply doesn't see certain standard fields; conversely, I wonder if DX4WIN's import filters can accept more than one input into, for example, the &quo

[Dx4win] Differing ADIF formats

2005-03-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uot; Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 2:16 PM Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Differing ADIF formats > I wonder if it follows, then, that DX4WIN simply doesn't see certain > standard fields; conversely, I wonder if DX4WIN's import filters can accept > more than one input into, for exam

[Dx4win] Differing ADIF formats

2005-03-12 Thread Pete Smith
- > >73, de Carlos - LA9PJA > >- Original Message - >From: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Pete Smith >To: <mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net>DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net >Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 3:45 PM >Subject: [Dx4win] Differing ADIF formats > >In connectio

[Dx4win] Differing ADIF formats

2005-03-11 Thread Pete Smith
In connection with another program, I have done some superficial research into ADIF. It seems as if there are two different standards out there: ADIF 1.0, on the hosenose site, and ADIF 2.1.5, on www.adif.org. Some ADIF exports seem to involve additional fields which are not in either standard