Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Rick Murphy
TQSL reports a successful upload once it is complete, so if you didn't see that message then there was some problem during the upload. You don't get a reply e-mail from LoTW when it accepts an automatically uploaded log (you will get an e-mail confirmation if you manually upload a tq8 by sending

Re: [Dx4win] TQSL 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Rick Murphy
Jim is right about this- the 1.14 upgrade doesn't remove your certificates or station setup. Those files are stored in %AppData%\TrustedQSL and shouldn't have been deleted during the upgrade. Did you perhaps run the old installer as Administrator and now not running it as Administrator? It may

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Pete Smith N4ZR
I successfully uploaded a 2099-QSO file to LOTW yesterday using 1.14.1, so I know it works. After you answered yes to theIs that correct? prompt, you should have seen a progress message reporting the QSO-by-QSO signing and uploading of the ADIF file. The big difference from previous versions

[Dx4win] TQSL 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread w8gc
Just a suggestion if you are signed in to the ARRL lotw site and you try to use TQSL 1.14.1 it will go through the complete process and tell you it did not work, you can not be in the web site and upload from TQSL 1.14.1 Maybe that is some of the problem? I use it 2 or 3 times a week with

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Jim - N4ST
Another advantage of the newer TQSL programs is that they automatically handle some of the newer digital modes without having to just blindly map them to a generic DATA mode. _ Jim - N4ST __ DX4WIN mailing list Home:

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
Older versions of tQSL will also handle the newer digital modes if you download the latest configuration file from the LotW web site (log in, select Your account, the Your Certificates) 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 6/3/2013 9:41 AM, Jim - N4ST wrote: Another advantage of the newer TQSL programs

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Dick White
Several of you have said that LoTW will not accept a ADIF file and needs a tq8 file. In the HELP file it states that LoTW will accept a ADIF and CABRILLO file. I did not find any prompt about a tq8 file and figured it was not needed in v1.14.1. I checked my ADIF file and it has the calls to up

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
In the HELP file it states that LoTW will accept a ADIF and CABRILLO file. I did not find any prompt about a tq8 file and figured it was not needed in v1.14.1. *READ* the help file again! From the first page of the Introduction: TQSL accepts QSOs in a log file whose format is either ADIF

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Dick White
First of all want to thank all of you who have sent me help information about my LoTW up load problem. I finally got the file up loaded and confirmed. I went through the process for a third time this morning and it worked. During the process there is a file that asks if you want to allow dupes.

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:27 AM, andyphewitt andyphew...@btopenworld.com wrote: From within DX4win I generated a .adi (g3svd.adi) file and saved it to the save folder in DX4W. Then went to the upload page of lotw, clicked on upload and then browsed to the .adi file, clicked on upload and it

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Erkki Heikkinen
Does this mean that you have to be logged on the LoTW web page before you can use the new T-QSL program? Erkki OH2BF -Original Message- From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Reisert AD1C Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 7:38 PM

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread andyphewitt
Erkki, Yes it is necessary to log on and then click on upload and browse to the .adi file. As Jim has said the tq8 file is generated automatically and it all happens from then on. 73 Andy G3SVD -Original Message- From: Erkki Heikkinen [mailto:erkki.heikki...@pp.inet.fi] Sent: 03 June

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread andyphewitt
Jim, Sorry - I thought you had to be logged in so that you could do an upload. Obviously I am wrong so that anyone can upload. My mistake. 73 Andy G3SVD -Original Message- From: jjreis...@gmail.com [mailto:jjreis...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jim Reisert AD1C Sent: 03 June 2013 18:05 To:

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Paul F6EXV
In other words : If you use the older version of TQSL, you need to create the tq8 file through it, then log into the webpage, and manually upload the tq8 file. If you use the newer version, the tq8 file will be uploaded automatically from within TQSL without need to log into the webpage. 73

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:48 AM, andyphewitt andyphew...@btopenworld.com wrote: Sorry - I thought you had to be logged in so that you could do an upload. Obviously I am wrong so that anyone can upload. The certificate with which you sign the log provides the credentials to LoTW to upload the

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Rick Murphy
Jim is as usual correct. You don't need to log in to the LoTW site to automatically upload logs to LoTW - the certificate provides all of the information needed to verify the upload. 73, -Rick On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C jjreis...@alum.mit.eduwrote: On Mon, Jun 3, 2013

Re: [Dx4win] TQSL 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Rick Murphy
Bob, Please explain. There is no problem whatsoever with being logged in to the LoTW site when uploading logs to LoTW. None. ARRL made a bunch of changes to the LoTW webpages over the last couple of weeks that broke all sorts of things, including TQSL. There is no problem as far as I know that

Re: [Dx4win] LoTW problem v 1.14.1

2013-06-03 Thread Dan Violette
Should not be an issue with dupes anymore. What I have seen people talk about is when there is a problem, it could think the file when resent is dupes. Just say send anyway and you are back in sync. Should not need it marked anymore and then will properly prevent you from sending a file twice