Sourceforge had some "security breaches". It appears to have caused
some of the web server files to be deleted. The info is stored in the
database, so getting the site back up shouldn't be too bad (unless
they got to the database too). I'll let everyone know when I get it
up and running again.
Of course, that would make understanding why it was modified a bit harder.
But in my opinion, changing it back to 0 shouldn't break the code. I can't
see anything else being influenced by Z indexes.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
i am not sure as to the reason, but I found that the change from 0 -> null
happened back in late february (revision 1.32).
it just so happens that pascal was the person that submitted the update : )
Daniel Holmen wrote:
> Then I think index 0 should be used in the new version aswell (unless thi
Then I think index 0 should be used in the new version aswell (unless this
was removed due to some horrible bug).
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] ZIndex problems
> th
this is because the old version (I just checked the code from the 2001.01.25
release) had 0 as the default index value. This is why it didn't have the
problem.
Daniel Holmen wrote:
> In NS4 you can set the Z Index AFTER the layer is created. But if you
> specify a Z Index before it is created,
I found the same problem with backgroundcolor in childlayers of widgets (in
NS4), they inherit the backgroundcolor of the parent.
This give a layers with the color of the parent:
o.handle=new DynLayer(null,0,0,285,105)
to make it transparent you have to do this:
o.parent.addChild(o.handle);
was it you who wrote the original loadpanel?
often wondered where it came from...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brandon
> Myers
> Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 10:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] RE: LoadPane
