Hi,
If I'm not mistaken you are using ns4/Linux. As other platforms don't have
this problem as far as I know.
I couldn't immediately find your workaround, so I might be repeating you,
but the reason we need the line "delete c " at all (apart from it being good
style) was in the fight against memor
On 6/17/2001, 11:16:50 PM EST, D. wrote about "[Dynapi-Dev] Attention...":
>> It is being handled by the DynAPI. If it wasn't then it would have
>> never worked in NS.
> There must be some sort of misunderstanding here.
> I am using v.2.53.
> If it did work, then should I be getting a javasc
> It is being handled by the DynAPI. If it wasn't then it would have
> never worked in NS.
There must be some sort of misunderstanding here.
I am using v.2.53.
If it did work, then should I be getting a javascript error???
Line number: 77.
Message: c is permanent.
I don't see how this is consi
>Remember that NN4 only allows modifications to the page
>code in loading time, and that every piece of HTML you write (with
>document.write()) appears and behaves like if it was hardcoded.
This is also the reason that NS4 does things like ignore CSS within remote
documents loaded into layers, fo
On 6/17/2001, 1:01:50 AM EST, D. wrote about "[Dynapi-Dev] Attention...":
> What do you mean Robert?? Is THAT good news?? LOL
> Obviously it is not handled by the DynAPI, because
> the deleteChild function instead of hiding the layer
> does a "delete c" as we know already.
> If what you say w
I'm for applying them. Let's see if I can have some free time next week.
En/Na Richard Bennett ha escrit:
> What do you think (moderators) , can we apply these changes? It doesn't look
> like they can cause any problems, and it's like the closing ";" a question
> of good style and uniformity.
>
At 07:01 17/06/2001, Deli Joannou wrote:
>Correct me if I am wrong, but people should then bare in mind that
>it's not being handled for Netscape at this very moment, although
>it was intended to have been, and will be probably some time in the
>future. For the time being, I guess, people should b
What do you think (moderators) , can we apply these changes? It doesn't look
like they can cause any problems, and it's like the closing ";" a question
of good style and uniformity.
Richard.
- Original Message -
From: "Stephan Tolksdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Anarchos -" <[EMAIL PROTE
As far as I can see the delete c
only deletes the reference to a dynlayer, the real
work is being done by c.del()
which calls this.specificRemove();
this is only being overwritten in dynapi.js, the
function is in dynlayer.js, there we see this:
DynLayer.prototype.specificRemove=
