To add: If we can all agree to post patches then when we want to fix a bug
we can check
if a patch has been posted. This also helps save duplicate work.
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Raymond Irving" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday
Been playing with DynAPI 3.0 alpha.. there are some real problems in
Mozilla.
The delete layer example doesn't delete the layers from the screen.
There are errors comming from the mousevents in most of the examples under
opera 7.
The layer deletion is somehat slow as well..
aside from that: so-f
Hello Dan,
I've just looked at it and you're correct. Firstly I
would suggest deleting the pathanim.js file and rename
the pathanim-full.js to pathanim.js. Then modify
dynapi.js to reflect the following:
this.add('dynapi.fx.Thread','thread.js','DynLayer');
this.add('dynapi.fx.PathAnimation','path
--- Benoit Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> It's great news to have the new dynapi3 in cvs.
> I've checked it out and tried a few examples. I
> tried the inline and
> got a lot of errors. I fixed all of them in
> dynlayer_inline.js.
Good job Benoit. Where you able to resolve
Hi there,
It's great news to have the new dynapi3 in cvs.
I've checked it out and tried a few examples. I tried the inline and got a lot of errors. I fixed all of them in dynlayer_inline.js. I don't have write access to cvs I think, so shall I get one ? Otherwise, what's the procedure to follow ?
Except that the 'advanced timeline' features in pathanim-full.js like
the PathAnimation.add method are not included in Thread.js, only the
functions from the pathanim.js are in thread.js. Should these be
included in the thread.js too? Or should these be seperated, because
they are large and are n
Dan (creator of DynAPI) said it's ok to remove both
the pathanim.js and the pathanim-full.js files. The
features of pathanim.js are inside thread.js
--
Raymond Irving
--- Dan Willemsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any reason that fx/pathanim.js exists
> anymore? It doesn't
I think the pathanim.js should be removed but the
pathanim-full.js I'll have to talk to Dan about that.
I'll check it out.
--
Raymond Irving
--- Dan Willemsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any reason that fx/pathanim.js exists
> anymore? It doesn't
> appear to be included a
Sorry wrong post.
--- Raymond Irving <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any ideas to the following question?
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
>
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
> http://shopping.yahoo
Any ideas to the following question?
Note: forwarded message attached.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
Is there any reason that fx/pathanim.js exists anym
Hello,
Is there any reason that fx/pathanim.js exists anymore? It doesn't
appear to be included anywhere, and all of its functions appear to be
now integrated into fx/thread.js. Is this file just there because noone
has deleted it yet? And if it is, should the fx/pathanim-full.js be
moved over
11 matches
Mail list logo
