> Michael, (and others submitting patches)
>
> I don't know if you followed the discussions on how to submit bugs/patches a
> while back?
> Basically things like this should be submitted as a patch, so they don't get
> lost, it saves you reposting stuff, and keeps comments on the patch in
> sequ
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Bürge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 12:43 AM
Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X: addEventListener
> there's a bug in the following method (in listeners.js):
>
> the corrected ver
It's been updated in CVS. Also, I added a 'dynapix' bug category to
the bug list at sourceforge. You can now submit dynapix bugs and
select the dynapix category so it will be easy to follow.
--
Robert Rainwater
On 3/22/2001, 4:58:41 PM EST, Michael wrote about "[Dynapi
there's a bug in the following method (in listeners.js):
the corrected version is:
DynObject.prototype.addEventListener=function(listener) {
if(!this.eventListeners) {
this.eventListeners = [];
}
// the following line has been moved
// it was inside the if-statement
t
there's a "this." missing in the following method (in listener.js)
DynObject.prototype.removeEventListener=function(listener) {
Methods.removeFromArray(this.eventListeners, listener, false);
if (eventListeners.length==0) { // <= this line!!
this.hasEventListeners=false;
}
right, it works better than before (you didn't let me in with the mac), but
it still crashes ie5 (when it tries to load an external document)
..i like it anyway.
> So far I have not encoutered any of the issues in Win platforms. If you check
> www.bbdo-u.com, I just updated it to DynAPI X and it
So far I have not encoutered any of the issues in Win platforms. If you check
www.bbdo-u.com, I just updated it to DynAPI X and it works perfect ( Win ) and
better than before ( Mac )
Michael Bürge wrote:
> no problem.
> if the src gets updated, the x and y should also be (as in the old version
no problem.
if the src gets updated, the x and y should also be (as in the old version).
but they don't seem to return the correct values anyway (at least not
always)
at the moment i'm trying to adopt some of my stuff to dynapi x, but i'm
running into troubles everywhere.
is there already an reso
Then it was me misunderstanding what Source meant. Honest I had never used that
property. Again my fault. You're right.
Michael Bürge wrote:
> ?
> in an eventlistener e.getSource() till now always returned me a reference to
> the dynlayer the listener is attached to.
>
> this is the bubbleEv
?
in an eventlistener e.getSource() till now always returned me a reference to
the dynlayer the listener is attached to.
this is the bubbleEvent-Method of the old api and the src property gets
updated:
MouseEvent.prototype.bubbleEvent=function() {
if (!this.bubble || this.src.getClass()=
The source property points to the layer where the event started. It
doesn't have to changed but in a few cases of mouseover in IE, which are
already being corrected in prebubbleCode()
___
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourcefor
there's one thing missing in the invokeEvent-method:
the src-property doesn't get updated when the event bubbles up.
DynObject.prototype.invokeEvent=function(type,e) {
if (!e) e=new DynEvent(type,this);
if (this.hasEventListeners) for(var
i=0;ihttp://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/
I did add the higherListener
I've already realised it is useless, and annoying. Just remove it. I already
have in my local version, just haven't had the time to update CVS.
Michael Bürge wrote:
> fact is: dragEvent doesn't work corectly with dynapi x when a layer is
> enabled for dragging befo
fact is: dragEvent doesn't work corectly with dynapi x when a layer is
enabled for dragging before it has been created (which happens all the time
in widgets)
i studied the code and dicovered that this is due to the higherListener
property not beeing set correctly, so that the mouseup/mousemove-e
-
From: "Doug Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X [addCodeToMethod]
> that's a very good idea, but it still leaves us open to 'appending'
> conflicting code
>
that's a very good idea, but it still leaves us open to 'appending'
conflicting code
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Rainwater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI
THANK YOU JORDI
estro - Ministral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X [addCodeToMethod]
> Ok.
>
> Instead of going into a programming techniques discussion I'll look at
this from
> another point of v
if that doesn't work, maybe it's hidden from anonymous users?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Jack_Speranza
> > Sent: 13 March 2001 17:06
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]&#x
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
> - Original Message -
> From: "Richard Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> <<< That looks good.
> A few minor things: >>&
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< That looks good.
A few minor things: >>>
OK :)
<<< * This sentence:
[...]
Might read easier like this: >>>
changed it as per your suggestion
<<< * Most links open a new window except the compatibility matrix link.
them.
Nice job!
Richard
- Original Message -
From: "Henrik Våglin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:19
PM
Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI
X
> I've published a submission guidelines at our website> now.
in
> Verzonden: woensdag 14 maart 2001 18:37
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
>
>
> When will it be 'ready' for DL?
> I would like to look it over..
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pascal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When will it be 'ready' for DL?
I would like to look it over..
- Original Message -
From: "Pascal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:59 AM
Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
> On another subject, before peo
I've published a submission guidelines at our website
now. Go check it out and please let know if you think
it is sufficient enough.
http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/dynapi/content.php?menu=14&page_id=13
All comments are welcome :)
Henrik Våglin [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
On another subject, before people start turning bezerk.. DynAPI X is not a
new distribution or new code.. once things are done it simply replaces the
current release and CVS code. (atleast that's what I thought we're wroking
towards)
so don't be afraid you have to choose between DynAPI2 or DynAPI
I would have wanted it to be more like "hooking". Hooking usually means
that there's an interface for what you can hook and what the hooked
objects can do etc, as well as the encapsulation borders of the hooked
object and the hook object being retained.
Having given it some extra thought, putting
I've noticed that you have split the events code.
If you are having problems, see the attached code. It is what I've been
using for the last few weeks and seems to work perfectly. All events
are now split and the core events code is still part of the api
(onprecreate / oncreate etc still works
decission.
>
> erik arvidsson
> http://webfx.nu
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jordi - IlMaestro - Ministral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 8:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
>
this is enough for you to rethink your decission.
erik arvidsson
http://webfx.nu
- Original Message -
From: "Jordi - IlMaestro - Ministral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
> Well ye
Pascal Bestebroer wrote:
> not sure if this started about the same thing, but I introduced an
> is.def property before. This was because alot of code is used in
> NS6 AND IE5 .. using an is.def property for those if loops,
> would give minor speed increases to those loops for the def
Two things:
a. Could someone help me set up CVS again I can't get it to work and have a
username pwd.
b. About this problem of setting up hooks I think we shuold add a way of
saying FINAL that means no one can hook (some kind of flag).
8an
___
Dynapi-
ascal Bestebroer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dynamic-core.net
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Cameron Hart
> Verzonden: dinsdag 13 maart 2001 19:17
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
>
>
> Cameron Hart wrote:
> >
> > > maybe we should hard code into the is.dom property to not
> include IE5/4
> > > windows (I think IE5 windows passes the test, but it's not
> DOM compliant)
> >
> > No, it fails. Well my version does anyway. Anyone got IE5.5?
> IE5 Mac passes.
>
> Just tested i
> >so unfortunately I can't test my theory ;-)
> I did test it and the problem is that ie 5 mac supports stuff
> like createElement but it still buggy when you go many level
> deep or when you start adding html to layers there are a lot of
> timing issue with ie 5 mac
> I would live ie 5 mac cod
Cameron Hart wrote:
>
> > maybe we should hard code into the is.dom property to not include IE5/4
> > windows (I think IE5 windows passes the test, but it's not DOM compliant)
>
> No, it fails. Well my version does anyway. Anyone got IE5.5? IE5 Mac passes.
Just tested it, IE5.5 passed the test
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
you can also browse to here:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/?cvsroot=dynapi
and save the files you need manually.
Can we expect snapshots of DynAPI3 ?
(err sorry Pascal, DynAPI X)
Richard
- Original Message -
From
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 6:05 PM
Subject: FW: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
> OK, I've prepared myself for trying to get my mind around this... but I
> can't even make it past trying to get into the CVS repository (should I be
> on the lookout for fallin
>I believe the test should be written in such a way >that if a browser
>supports enough of the DOM, it should use the DOM code
> rather than it's own proprietry way of doing things. >It is possible that if we have
>a DOM branch
>for a lot of the core API, things like Mac IE should >use the DOM
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jack_Speranza
> Sent: 13 March 2001 17:06
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: FW: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
>
>
> OK, I've prepared myself for trying to get my mind around this... but I
> can't even make it past
t: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
( Takes deep breath, puts helmet on, tells mom he loves her in case he
doesn't
make it back )
< .
< .
-- Where to find: available through CVS as module 'dynapix'
Ok, there you go. Shall the battle begin.
( takes deep breath, loo
n b.v.
> http://www.oibv.com
>
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Cameron Hart
> > Verzonden: dinsdag 13 maart 2001 15:32
> > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Onderwerp: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
beron Informatiesystemen b.v.
http://www.oibv.com
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Cameron Hart
> Verzonden: dinsdag 13 maart 2001 15:32
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
>
>
> I was just looking
I was just looking at the mouseevent code, and I've got a suggestion.
Instead is going (is.def&&!is.ie), why don't you say is.ns6 OR create a new
is.dom2 test or is.dom2e (e for events). I'm think NS6 is probably the only
browser that does DOM2 events at the moment anyway, but providing a dom2e
te
> I agree that this is a desirable feature. What you did seems not all
> that different from Lisp's advice, so you should be pleased. The fact
> that it still raises hackles should suggest that there is still a better
> way to do it while maintaining the desired optionality and separation of
>
(I'm a lurker, hoping to have more time to participate.)
Jordi - IlMaestro - Ministral writes:
> Well yes if any of my computer engineering teachers could see that
> code, they'd throw me through the window. If I had come up with a
> better idea, then I would have chosen that one. The fact her
> Having given this a few minutes of thought, this is something which
> scares me. Having the possibility of your function being
> modified by any
> other package or extension is a horrible thought, because it means you
> have no way of telling in what ways your function might change
> dynamically
Well yes if any of my computer engineering teachers could see that code, they'd
throw me through the window. If I had come up with a better idea, then I would have
chosen that one. The fact here was that we needed to add functionalities to certain
pieces of code depending on what was loaded. Howev
Jordi - IlMaestro - Ministral wrote:
> Fift: i have included a generic method that allows to add lines of code to
> already defined methods. So if you look at dynlayer.js and you can't see any
> eventcapturing code, don't be puzzled. If you open mouse.js ( where the
> mouseevents are now ) you wil
I resent that. And no need to tracroute just look in the email headers.
8an
___
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
Actually the think I would like the most is seeing people fighting with the memory
leak. That is seeing what does the methods.destroy do, where does it fail, how many
ram is it capable to free and so.
I'm still dealing with events ( those mouseover, mouseouts are going to kill me ) and
other brow
Great! Excellent! I like it!
Is there any way I can help?
Cheers,
Daniel
Jordi - IlMaestro - Ministral wrote:
> For the last days/weeks we've been undergoing a very heavy rewrite of the API.
> Since it was not a matter of lines but a very big rewriting, we decided to keep
> it quiet and paral
Hey,
Traceroute these guys, and you'll end up in some forgotten strange asylum for
the mentally deranged... except 8tan, of course, he's just a puppy living with
his parents :)))
Hehe,
Dann
begin:vcard
n:Martens;Danny
tel;cell:+32(0)478.544.003
tel;fax:+32(0)2.706.52.01
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 11:50 AM
Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI X
> ( Takes deep breath, puts helmet on, tells mom he loves her in case he
doesn't
> make it back )
>
> Seeing that this list has lately been a very boring and quiet lake of
peaceful
>
> jobs and real lives. Or is that your secret... none of you have real jobs
> or real
> lives, do you)
Of course we do!!
(hey guys, I think we've been found out!!)
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG Free Edition
Download at: http://www.grisoft.com/html/us_index.cfm
Checked
is stuff on top of having
real
jobs and real lives. Or is that your secret... none of you have real jobs
or real
lives, do you)
-Original Message-
From: Jordi - IlMaestro - Ministral [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Dynap
( Takes deep breath, puts helmet on, tells mom he loves her in case he doesn't
make it back )
Seeing that this list has lately been a very boring and quiet lake of peaceful
coding, allow me to throw a new disturbance focus.
For the last days/weeks we've been undergoing a very heavy rewrite of th
57 matches
Mail list logo
