Hello Dan,
I've just looked at it and you're correct. Firstly I
would suggest deleting the pathanim.js file and rename
the pathanim-full.js to pathanim.js. Then modify
dynapi.js to reflect the following:
this.add('dynapi.fx.Thread','thread.js','DynLayer');
this.add('dynapi.fx.PathAnimation','path
Except that the 'advanced timeline' features in pathanim-full.js like
the PathAnimation.add method are not included in Thread.js, only the
functions from the pathanim.js are in thread.js. Should these be
included in the thread.js too? Or should these be seperated, because
they are large and are n
Dan (creator of DynAPI) said it's ok to remove both
the pathanim.js and the pathanim-full.js files. The
features of pathanim.js are inside thread.js
--
Raymond Irving
--- Dan Willemsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any reason that fx/pathanim.js exists
> anymore? It doesn't
I think the pathanim.js should be removed but the
pathanim-full.js I'll have to talk to Dan about that.
I'll check it out.
--
Raymond Irving
--- Dan Willemsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any reason that fx/pathanim.js exists
> anymore? It doesn't
> appear to be included a
lowers for Valentine's Day
> http://shopping.yahoo.com
> ATTACHMENT part 2 message/rfc822
> From: Dan Willemsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] PathAnimation
> Date: 12 Feb 2003 17:07:00 -0600
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there any reason
Any ideas to the following question?
Note: forwarded message attached.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
Is there any reason that fx/pathanim.js exists anym
Hello,
Is there any reason that fx/pathanim.js exists anymore? It doesn't
appear to be included anywhere, and all of its functions appear to be
now integrated into fx/thread.js. Is this file just there because noone
has deleted it yet? And if it is, should the fx/pathanim-full.js be
moved over
