For those who have no asp envirnoment, but would
like one:
www.domaindlx.com
100% Free asp hosting.
100 megs of space
NO BANNERS!!!
NO POPUPS!!!
Database functionality included.
Not too slow either: http://a.domaindlx.com/DouglasMelvin/
---Outgoing mail is
certified Virus Free.Checked by
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Dynapi-Dev] note:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dougal Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Richard Bennett wrot
- Original Message -
From: "Dougal Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Richard Bennett wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > I think you're right there, however I tried to check this, but couldn't
> > replicate the bug this was supposed to fix.
> > Wasn't it that in IE5.5 an empty layer
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Dougal Campbell wrote:
> It has to do with SSL pages. If the DynLayer is from a page secured with
> SSL, the "url(javascript:void)" syntax caused IE5.5 to complain about
> unsecure elements in the page. I don't think mouse events were an issue
> (unless there was some older re
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Richard Bennett wrote:
> [...]
> I think you're right there, however I tried to check this, but couldn't
> replicate the bug this was supposed to fix.
> Wasn't it that in IE5.5 an empty layer wouldn't catch mouse-events?
It has to do with SSL pages. If the DynLayer is from a
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Rainwater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > {background-image: none}
>
> > ...without the "url()" enclosing it.
>
> Yes, in that instance none is correct (which is how is would be done
> in css). But using url it is evaluated as an expression. The problem,
> I t
On 11/1/2001, Scott Andrew LePera wrote:
> "none" actually is a proper value, but it should be expressed this way:
> {background-image: none}
> ...without the "url()" enclosing it.
Yes, in that instance none is correct (which is how is would be done
in css). But using url it is evaluated as a
>
> > Thats not really a good idea, because none has no real value. So you
> > are assigning undefined as a background image. Sure it may work, but
> I would argue
> > that the real image solution is cleaner.
>
> "none" actually is a proper value, but it should be expressed this way:
>
>
Robert Rainwater wrote:
> Thats not really a good idea, because none has no real value. So you
> are assigning undefined as a background image. Sure it may work, but
I would argue
> that the real image solution is cleaner.
"none" actually is a proper value, but it should be expressed this
connection.
> (and if transparent layers still catch events in IE5.5)
> Thanks for the fix Doug.
> Richard.
> - Original Message -
> From: Doug Melvin
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:14 PM
> Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] note:
>>[*]
n over a secure
connection.
(and if transparent layers still catch events in
IE5.5)
Thanks for the fix Doug.
Richard.
- Original Message -
From: Doug Melvin
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:14 PM
Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] note:
>[*] Old IE5.5 event fix, w
>[*] Old IE5.5 event fix, which used a javascript:null as background
image for empty layers, had to be>changed into using a real transparent
gif which is supplied with the standard distribution, due>to that
javascript:null image causing a warning when using DynAPI via a secure server
(https:
12 matches
Mail list logo
