Joseph Firmino [EMAIL PROTECTED] correctly suggested:
I'm pretty sure they already have this in the SCI interface. For example:
input type=hidden name=STATUS_URL value=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
James M. Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
http://www.fastsci.com/ makes email notification incredibly
At 10:11 AM 24/09/2002 -0400, David Beroff wrote:
I have *no* argument with any of the above solutions, other than that they
are all compensating for a basic feature that e-gold should provide directly.
More to the point, you only get the email feature if you use one of these
alternatives.
The
David Beroff wrote:
... So, what am I missing?
Er...
A few zeros on the right-hand end of your cost estimate? :)
Seriously, I'm sure it's do-able, and it may someday be done,
but there are more-pressing issues at the moment than email
notification, frankly. Thanks.
JMR
---
You are
David, there's no question that e-gold will get around to offering
what you ask for.
It's obviously a must have feature on a IG system.
e-gold has a history of moving at a stately pace and then eventually
solving problems / adding cool stuff. And once it's done, its done
right.
e-gold
Ian Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David, I think there are more costs than just the coding, like the ongoing
server load and bandwidth usage. So it is stretching it a little to suggest
it is simply a matter of spending USD$100.
Fair enough. Our primary outbound mail server for
At 11:37 AM -0400 9/24/02, David Beroff wrote:
That's reasonable. What if we agreed that the default would be the simple
notification prompt, with no details. (Even just that would help address most
of my original concerns.) Each user would then have the option of turning
these off, or turning
Besides, many of the e-gold daily transactions are Incentive payment stuff
($ 0.01 or less payments) that I sure wouldn't want to receive those as
email notifications !
That leaves a lot less emails to be sent
Also, if the email just stated : Your received $ of Gold in your
account form
At 12:27 PM 9/23/2002 -0400, David Beroff wrote:
In the future, this could actually
be expanded to the postage-based email system
that many have envisioned, where a person could
configure that they would not read unsolicited
commercial emails unless they were getting paid
at least X mg.
Such a
At 06:05 PM 24/09/2002 +0200, AnyGoldNow wrote:
Also, if the email just stated : Your received $ of Gold in your
account form XYZ, that wouldn't jeopardize anyone's account number or data
in unsecured emails
Unless those reading your e-mails are government agencies using snooping
laws to
- Original Message -
From: David Beroff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Lack of an email confirmation sent
: from e-gold to both parties with all transaction
:details, under all circumstances.
Pecunix gives you the choice, you can turn the e-mails on or off. Plus, you can
choose whether you want
As I continue to use e-gold for more and more real
business transactions, one thing continues to stick out
like a sore thumb: Lack of an email confirmation sent
from e-gold to both parties with all transaction details,
under all circumstances.
I'm pretty sure they already have this in the
http://www.fastsci.com/ makes email notification incredibly
easy. Just replace your account number email with Norse's
and you've done it.
JMR
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use e-gold's Secure
Or of course, you can just use the original, 1mdcGrams, which
everyone has copied! ;-)
http://www.fastsci.com/ makes email notification incredibly
easy. Just replace your account number email with Norse's
and you've done it.
JMR
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL
13 matches
Mail list logo
