If all of the gold
currencies are compatible with each other, they all have access to the total
market. If they are not compatible, as is the case today, and each try to
build their own global market, none of them will be as successful because
the market will be fragmented.
looks to me
At 12:58 AM 3/30/2001 -0500, C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc. wrote:
On 29 Mar 2001, at 23:04, George Matyjewicz wrote:
Read my statement above once again. They are committed, but not
yet funded.
George, most of these committments are for SR-USD if I read well
what you have said over tha past
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's funny how every new gold currency company on the block touts
themselves as revolutionizing global commerce by providing
instantly-clearing currency transactions. This claim of having
something new and earthshaking is made by Standard Reserve, GoldMoney,
and
To: "e-gold Discussion" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:04 PM
Subject: [e-gold-list] Re: Yada yada yada
At 05:03 PM 3/29/2001 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The gold currency companies need to realize that they would all
benefit by doing this, even e-gold. He
At 10:25 PM 3/29/2001 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George M of SR writes: "As of this writing, we have surpassed that number
of committed accounts, and should have more than that in funded accounts
before the year is out."
George, please clarify for me:
Are you saying that SR has more than 500,000 accounts?
What does committed account mean??
Where are your statistics?
The only way that a system that is backed by e-gold
can have twice as many accounts as e-gold
is if those accounts have about 1 atom of gold each
On 29 Mar 2001, at 23:04, George Matyjewicz wrote:
Read my statement above once again. They are committed, but not
yet funded.
George, most of these committments are for SR-USD if I read well
what you have said over tha past many weeks. And this currency
is not part of the Gold Economy.
