Thanks for taking it up.
Let me know in case if you require any help from my side.
Rgds,
Nishit Shah.
On 6/6/2012 5:32 AM, Vick, Matthew wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nishit Shah [mailto:nishit.s...@elitecore.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 11:43 PM
To:
commit ca3ccc6835943287b6f69e973c126a02bc4de409
Author: ethan.zhao ethan.ker...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Jun 6 07:32:11 2012 -0700
modified: drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
While e1000e_check_options() is called, netdev is not registered, so the
e1000e driver will print
Hi Alex,
I've done some further testing. I have considered these 4 configurations:
queues cpus
A. Fedora 14, builtin driver 2.1.0 8 1
B. Fedora 16, builtin driver 3.2.10 8 12
C. Fedora
On 06/06/2012 07:57 AM, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
Hi Alex,
I've done some further testing. I have considered these 4 configurations:
queues cpus
A. Fedora 14, builtin driver 2.1.08 1
B. Fedora 16, builtin driver
From: Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 19:05:04 +0200
You cant hold a TX completion indefinitely, this breaks BQL but also
other stuff.
True.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive
On 06/06/2012 09:31 AM, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 08:33:33AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On 06/06/2012 07:57 AM, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
queues cpus
A. Fedora 14, builtin driver 2.1.0 8
I'm not exactly sure what the exact effect of WTHRESH is here. Does
the device coalesce 5 completions regardless of size? Would the
problem be avoided if bql limit_min were MTU, or could same issue be
hit with larger that 64 byte packets?
Tom
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Hiroaki SHIMODA
From: Tom Herbert therb...@google.com
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:21:40 -0700
I'm not exactly sure what the exact effect of WTHRESH is here. Does
the device coalesce 5 completions regardless of size? Would the
problem be avoided if bql limit_min were MTU, or could same issue be
hit with larger
-Original Message-
From: Jack Wang [mailto:jack_w...@usish.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 11:56 PM
To: Linux NICS
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] query for i350 network card test under linux
Hi all,
I want to find a tool to verify the network card hardware
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: Tom Herbert therb...@google.com
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:21:40 -0700
I'm not exactly sure what the exact effect of WTHRESH is here. Does
the device coalesce 5 completions regardless of size? Would the
-Original Message-
From: Arthur LENA [mailto:arthur.l...@ftw.at]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 1:25 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] Hardware Timestamping in i350-T4
Hello everyone,
I have been working with the i350-T4 ethernet card to test a packet
On 06/06/2012 01:44 PM, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:53:54AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
Actually the interrupt layout could have a significant impact. Do you
happen to know if CPU C states are enabled on your system? You can
verify this by checking with a
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 22:57 +0800, Ethan Zhao wrote:
commit ca3ccc6835943287b6f69e973c126a02bc4de409
Author: ethan.zhao ethan.ker...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Jun 6 07:32:11 2012 -0700
modified: drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
While e1000e_check_options() is called,
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kirsher [mailto:jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 5:41 PM
To: Ethan Zhao
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Linux NICS; LKML
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [next-net PATCH]
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e: fix unregistered
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:17:08PM +0100, Chris Boot wrote:
On 23/04/2012 22:29, Chris Boot wrote:
ASPM on the 82574 causes trouble. Currently the driver disables L0s for
this NIC but only disables L1 if the MTU is 1500. This patch simply
causes L1 to be disabled regardless of the MTU
Hi all,
I want to find a tool to verify the network card hardware if functional
under Linux, does any one know.
I have already tried ethtool v3.2 with igb driver 3.4.7. but ethtool -t
ethx
external_lb is always return :
ethtool -t eth14 external_lb
The test result is FAIL
16 matches
Mail list logo