Re: [E1000-devel] i40e: crash on NMI by continuous module reload

2015-02-27 Thread nick
you try removing the msleep line as this one is most likely causing the issue due to sleeping for some long in a probe function is generally a bad idea. Thanks, Nick -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e: crash on NMI by continuous module reload

2015-02-27 Thread nick
On 2015-02-27 09:16 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote: On 27.02.2015 15:02, nick wrote: [...] i40e: Fix a bug where Rx would stop after some time [...] diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c index f7464e8..ff6d94d 100644

Re: [E1000-devel] [bisected regression] e1000e: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2015-02-11 Thread nick
discussed here as uncovered in the driver supported by Intel. Thanks A lot, Nick -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] net:ethernet:intel:Remove outdated fix me comment in the function, gb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210

2015-02-09 Thread Nick Krause
explain the reasons for these values in another patch with a added comment rather then just removing the FIXME. Nick -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] net:ethernet:intel:Remove outdated fix me comment in the function, gb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210

2015-02-08 Thread nick
deletion(-) Thank Nick, I will add your patch to my queue. Oh and the title should be igb: Remove outdated ..., not net:ethernet:intel: Remove ... Jeff, Sorry about the title. Good to known for next time. Should I resend or will you fix the title for me? Cheers, Nick

Re: [E1000-devel] Return Value for the function, u32 i40e_fcoe_ctxt_eof in i40e_fcoe_ctx_eof

2015-01-26 Thread nick
Jeff, That's fine, I assumed someone else was going to fix it. Nick On 2015-01-26 12:10 AM, Jeff Kirsher wrote: On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 18:20 -0500, nick wrote: I am wondering what the correct error return value is for the function stated in my message. What message? In the title you state

[E1000-devel] Possible Bug Found with Build Warning?

2014-12-05 Thread nick
a mistake on me reading the warning. Regards Nick -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing

Re: [E1000-devel] [linux-nics] FIX ME in e1000_82575.c

2014-11-24 Thread nick
Sounds good enough, just a question why is my email bouncing against linux-nics mailing list? Cheers Nick On 14-11-24 11:32 AM, Fujinaka, Todd wrote: I'm not sure there's much need to actually change the value. It's been the same since 2007 when the log message says, Removed FIXME comment

[E1000-devel] FIX ME in e1000_82575.c

2014-11-22 Thread nick
the values, I would be glad to send it a patch fixing these outstanding issues. Regards Nick -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports

Re: [E1000-devel] Dell R720 SR-IOV failure with igb

2012-06-05 Thread Nick
, but not Fedora.) I'm starting to suspect a deeper problem in CentOS at this time. - -- Nick -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/Oy+wACgkQdD1FRJKImAM0twCfSLwC95aa6XJfwqIKBcPafLaI

Re: [E1000-devel] link loss with Intel I340-T4 and CentOS 6.2

2012-05-29 Thread Nick
On 05/29/2012 11:18 AM, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote: -Original Message- From: Nick [mailto:n...@deepgroove.org] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 1:39 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] link loss with Intel I340-T4 and CentOS 6.2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE