On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:12:17PM +0400, Roman Kagan wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 11:37 +0400, Roman Kagan wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 06:15 +0400, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:43:58PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher tar...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 07 Jun
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 11:37 +0400, Roman Kagan wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 06:15 +0400, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:43:58PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher tar...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:38:17 -0700
Thanks! I have applied the patch to my
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 06:15 +0400, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:43:58PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher tar...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:38:17 -0700
Thanks! I have applied the patch to my queue
Why?
My impression is that this is a patch
From: Jeff Kirsher tar...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:38:17 -0700
Thanks! I have applied the patch to my queue
Why?
My impression is that this is a patch already in the tree, and it's
being submitted for -stable but such minor performance hacks are
absolutely not appropriate for
On 06/07/2012 02:43 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher tar...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:38:17 -0700
Thanks! I have applied the patch to my queue
Why?
My impression is that this is a patch already in the tree, and it's
being submitted for -stable but such minor performance
On 06/07/2012 05:49 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
[Upstream commit 31c15a2f24ebdab14333d9bf5df49757842ae2ec with paths
adjusted to compensate for the drivers/net/ethernet/intel reorg in
dee1ad47f2ee75f5146d83ca757c1b7861c34c3b]
Author: Dean Nelson dnel...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 25 14:39:24 2011
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:43:58PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher tar...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:38:17 -0700
Thanks! I have applied the patch to my queue
Why?
My impression is that this is a patch already in the tree, and it's
being submitted for -stable but
