On 04/26/2012 06:40 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 17:05 -0700, prasanna.panchamu...@riverbed.com
> wrote:
>> From: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi
>>
>> Following logs where seen on Systems with multiple NICs& ports,
>> while using MSI interrupts as shown below:
> [...]
>> This patch ch
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 17:05 -0700, prasanna.panchamu...@riverbed.com
wrote:
> From: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi
>
> Following logs where seen on Systems with multiple NICs & ports,
> while using MSI interrupts as shown below:
[...]
> This patch changes the IRQ tests to use polling loops starting with
On 04/26/2012 05:05 PM, prasanna.panchamu...@riverbed.com wrote:
> From: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi
>
> Following logs where seen on Systems with multiple NICs & ports,
> while using MSI interrupts as shown below:
>
> Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel: :00:0d.0: lan0_0: NIC Link is
> Up
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 17:42 -0700, Prasanna Panchamukhi wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 05:20 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > On 04/26/2012 05:05 PM, prasanna.panchamu...@riverbed.com wrote:
> >> From: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi
> >>
> >> Following logs where seen on Systems with multiple NICs& ports,
> >> while
On 04/26/2012 05:20 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 05:05 PM, prasanna.panchamu...@riverbed.com wrote:
>> From: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi
>>
>> Following logs where seen on Systems with multiple NICs& ports,
>> while using MSI interrupts as shown below:
>>
>> Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.noti
From: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi
Following logs where seen on Systems with multiple NICs & ports,
while using MSI interrupts as shown below:
Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel: :00:0d.0: lan0_0: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice
On 04/19/2012 11:09 AM, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:59:47 -0700
> Prasanna Panchamukhi wrote:
>
>> On 04/19/2012 08:54 AM, Allan, Bruce W wrote:
>>> We have not seen a report of this issue before. Please provide details on
>>> the NIC or LOM and system/chipset on which the p
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:59:47 -0700
Prasanna Panchamukhi wrote:
> On 04/19/2012 08:54 AM, Allan, Bruce W wrote:
> > We have not seen a report of this issue before. Please provide details on
> > the NIC or LOM and system/chipset on which the problem occurs and how the
> > additional 50ms was det
On 04/19/2012 08:54 AM, Allan, Bruce W wrote:
> We have not seen a report of this issue before. Please provide details on
> the NIC or LOM and system/chipset on which the problem occurs and how the
> additional 50ms was determined.
This has been seen mostly with Intel 82571 Dual port Gigabit Et
We have not seen a report of this issue before. Please provide details on the
NIC or LOM and system/chipset on which the problem occurs and how the
additional 50ms was determined.
> -Original Message-
> From: prasanna.panchamu...@riverbed.com
> [mailto:prasanna.panchamu...@riverbed.com]
From: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi
Following logs where seen on Systems with multiple NICs,
while using MSI interrupts as shown below:
Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel: :00:0d.0: lan0_0: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel:
11 matches
Mail list logo
