> -Original Message-
> From: Gabe Black [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:54 PM
> To: Duyck, Alexander H
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] packet header split configuration
>
> > -Ori
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Duyck [mailto:[email protected]]
> When we had to pull support for Header splitting on 82599 we found that
> we were actually able to implement an approach that performed better
> than packet split did using single buffer mode. As such we ha
On 01/23/2013 10:24 AM, Gabe Black wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alexander Duyck [mailto:[email protected]]
>> It is interesting that you mention the 82598. To the best of my
>> knowledge it does have the same behavior as the igb parts currently
>> have in regards to pack
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Duyck [mailto:[email protected]]
> It is interesting that you mention the 82598. To the best of my
> knowledge it does have the same behavior as the igb parts currently
> have in regards to packet split. However the follow-on to that part,
On 01/22/2013 03:16 PM, Gabe Black wrote:
> I have been spending some time in the igb driver code to understand what I
> would have to change to make more use of the header-split features of the
> cards.
>
> I noticed that header-split is always set to
> E1000_SRRCTL_DESCTYPE_HDR_SPLIT_ALWAYS, w
I have been spending some time in the igb driver code to understand what I
would have to change to make more use of the header-split features of the cards.
I noticed that header-split is always set to
E1000_SRRCTL_DESCTYPE_HDR_SPLIT_ALWAYS, which translates to setting DESCTYPE in
the SRRCTL reg
