Re: [easybuild] Upgrading easybuild from 2.3 to 2.4

h that is akin to feature: eb https:// example.com/EasyBuild-2.4.0.eb # and just do the right thing In other words some kind of support to not only "--from-pr"

[easybuild] Current "expirmental/untested" easyconfig dump

At the hackathon two weeks ago mention was made of a git repo with laxxer requirements for submission. Is that Fotis's easybuild-experimental repo?: https://github.com/fgeorgatos/easybuild.experimental/tree/master/users or is there a newer one (it looks rather old/idle). Just curious where I

Re: [easybuild] Upgrading easybuild from 2.3 to 2.4

Howdy Joachim, If you go to the EB Github, you can select the 'develop' branch to download the easyconfig for the current release. That's what I typically do. e.g. # go to EB-easyconfig Github, select 'develop' branch, navigate to EasyBuild easyconfigs, select latest, click on 'Raw' and

Re: [easybuild] Easybuild on CentOS/RHEL 7

Hi Luis, On 01/12/15 14:04, Luis Alves wrote: Hi everyone, Is anybody successfully using EB on CentOS/RHEL 7? I'm having some errors with OpenBLAS-0.2.6 and glibc-devel-2.17-78.el7.x86_64. From my searches this might be solved for OpenBLAS-0.2.7 but before I start tweaking the .eb files I'd

[easybuild] Easybuild on CentOS/RHEL 7

Hi everyone, Is anybody successfully using EB on CentOS/RHEL 7? I'm having some errors with OpenBLAS-0.2.6 and glibc-devel-2.17-78.el7.x86_64. From my searches this might be solved for OpenBLAS-0.2.7 but before I start tweaking the .eb files I'd liked to know if I'll face any other problems.

Re: [easybuild] dedicated conf call on issues with 2016 versions of Intel tools

Hi all, Time for this conf call dedicated to supporting the 2016 versions of the Intel compilers/libraries is now fixed to Thu Dec 3rd 2016, 10am CET, see also: https://plus.google.com/events/cen5lk9g1e881vlm5hc45c72h6k I'm going to assume that Lumìr, Thekla, Luca and Ward are joining

[easybuild] Upgrading easybuild from 2.3 to 2.4

Hi, After all the recent discussions on building EasyBuild sandboxes on a machine with an EasyBuild installation (e.g. conflicts due to config files) I am now wondering what is the recommended procedure to upgrade an EasyBuild installation from 2.3 to 2.4. I assumed I would just build that

Re: [easybuild] options to source urls

Hello, yes I found that way to compose a URL, but as you said it doest help in my case. Enabling the more advanced feature would be perfect. Regards, Danilo On 1 Dec 2015, at 10:21, Kenneth Hoste > wrote: Hi Danilo, On 01/12/15

Re: [easybuild] options to source urls

Hi Danilo, On 01/12/15 10:12, Danilo Guerrera wrote: Hello list, is there a way to pass options to the source urls? This can be useful for downloading software such as Java this way completely automating the build process (without relying on the user to download it). No, not really. There

[easybuild] options to source urls

Hello list, is there a way to pass options to the source urls? This can be useful for downloading software such as Java this way completely automating the build process (without relying on the user to download it). Regards, Danilo