Re: [easybuild] Re: Question about PETSc EasyBlock

2017-02-21 Thread Åke Sandgren
On 02/22/2017 03:40 AM, Maxime Boissonneault wrote: > Thanks Robert, > While I understand and am all in favor of reusing dependencies, most > packages with dependencies do not provide download hooks for specific > versions of their dependencies. PETSc is this way, I believe OpenFoam > too. When

Re: [easybuild] Re: Question about PETSc EasyBlock

2017-02-21 Thread Maxime Boissonneault
Thanks Robert, While I understand and am all in favor of reusing dependencies, most packages with dependencies do not provide download hooks for specific versions of their dependencies. PETSc is this way, I believe OpenFoam too. When the developers go through this trouble, I prefer to assume

Re: [easybuild] Re: Question about PETSc EasyBlock

2017-02-21 Thread Robert Schmidt
I'm not an expert at PETSc (though I know it is widely used on large clusters, I haven't see it in bioinfo). My general reading is that there are two general EasyBuild principles at work here, but they are certainly at odds with a few of these "bundle all the deps" type installs that we are seeing

[easybuild] Re: Question about PETSc EasyBlock

2017-02-21 Thread Maxime Boissonneault
To give more concreteness to my question, here is what our PETSc install script looks like. It is pretty much a configure make make install. # module --force purge # module load compilers/intel mpi/openmpi libs/mkl/11.1 apps/cmake/2.8.12 apps/buildtools apps/devtools mpi/openmpi/1.8.8 # cd

Re: [easybuild] RE: R-3.3.2-foss-2016.09 module load error

2017-02-21 Thread Peretti-Pezzi Guilherme
Hi We’ve also spotted differences on the Jenkins shell under RH, maybe because its shell is not interactive. The profile was not being sourced, so we had to add it to the jenkins script: source ~/.profile We don’t use Lmod though, not sure this will help. Cheers, -- Guilherme Peretti-Pezzi