On 14/03/2023 11:04, Ole Holm Nielsen wrote:
On 2/15/23 15:30, Jure Pečar wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:26:26 +0100
Ole Holm Nielsen wrote:
Is "foss" also the preferred toolchain on AMD Rome and Genoa?
For now, yes.
There's some work going on to create a toolchain around amd compilers
...@lists.ugent.be Im
Auftrag von Ole Holm Nielsen
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. März 2023 11:05
An: easybuild@lists.ugent.be
Betreff: Re: [easybuild] Which toolchain to use on AMD EPYC 9004 "Genoa"?
ACHTUNG! Diese E-Mail kommt von Extern! WARNING! This email originated
off-campus.
On 2/15/23 15:30, Jure P
On 2/15/23 15:30, Jure Pečar wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:26:26 +0100
Ole Holm Nielsen wrote:
Is "foss" also the preferred toolchain on AMD Rome and Genoa?
For now, yes.
There's some work going on to create a toolchain around amd compilers but
it's questionable how much you gain as all
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:26:26 +0100
Ole Holm Nielsen wrote:
> Is "foss" also the preferred toolchain on AMD Rome and Genoa?
For now, yes.
There's some work going on to create a toolchain around amd compilers but
it's questionable how much you gain as all features these compilers and
libs bring
In an upcoming procurement we plan to use a GPAW EasyBuild module for
benchmarking. On 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors we should
presumably specify a recent "intel" toolchain because of support for the
latest instructions.
Question: Which toolchain to use on AMD EPYC 9004 "Genoa"?
5 matches
Mail list logo