On 12/08/2017 12:39 PM, Alvarez, Damian wrote:
+1 for going for 18.1. But the glibc issues (not kernel issues) have been
solved already (https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:3296). This package
should find its way into CentOS 7.4 real quick (maybe it is already there, I am
not sure).
Hi,
Reading through Kenneth’ reply, I am honestly wondering whether we should skip
a foss/2018a. The below does not suggest any big upgrade. Considering the
human cost of moving all "helper” packages (such as HDF5, netcdf, Python and
Pythonwrapers, Boost) that our users require, I am close
+1 for going for 18.1. But the glibc issues (not kernel issues) have been
solved already (https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:3296). This package
should find its way into CentOS 7.4 real quick (maybe it is already there, I am
not sure).
Damian
On 08/12/17 10:35,
3 matches
Mail list logo