Re: [easybuild] foss + CUDA toolchain

2017-01-24 Thread Kenneth Hoste
On 24/01/2017 16:56, Benjamin Evans wrote: ​Davide, Seems like a good idea to me. Would it make sense to build it on top of the gcccuda​ toolchain? Maybe call it fosscuda to fit with several of the other toolchains that include CUDA? +1, it would make sense, but someone else would have

Re: [easybuild] Successful builds fail when LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8

2017-01-24 Thread Kenneth Hoste
On 24/01/2017 16:31, Robert Schmidt wrote: I'm wrong about the encoding stuff. Maybe Kenneth can respond. There must be a different type of string in the list. I'll look around in the code to see if there is a standard way of handling it... These kind of bugs can be tricky to fix, but

Re: [easybuild] Successful builds fail when LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8

2017-01-24 Thread Kenneth Hoste
On 24/01/2017 16:43, Maxime Boissonneault wrote: On 17-01-24 10:25, Robert Schmidt wrote: Do you really need to upload the test report? If you need to share something just gist the build log. Sorry ? I only posted the stack trace, not the test report itself ? Rob mentioned the test

Re: [easybuild] How to compile vasp with my Local Ifort

2017-01-24 Thread Kenneth Hoste
Hi David, On 20/01/2017 17:17, David Ramírez wrote: Hi I used old Ifort (version 12). I need to compile Open-MPI for example and another programs. I tried to edit some easyconfig files. However does no work. I see toolchains. My question is. Can I use my local compilers inside some files?

[easybuild] toolchain which uses existing, optimized, MPI/ScaLAPACK and build environment?

2017-01-24 Thread Gunnar Sauer
Hello EasyBuild experts, currently I am working as intern in a small engineering company which is accessing two clusters for their simulation and viz tasks (one remote cray system, one smaller local Xeon cluster). My task is to examine to what degree EasyBuild can simplify maintaining on both

Re: [easybuild] foss + CUDA toolchain

2017-01-24 Thread Benjamin Evans
​Davide, Seems like a good idea to me. Would it make sense to build it on top of the gcccuda​ toolchain? Maybe call it fosscuda to fit with several of the other toolchains that include CUDA? On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Vanzo, Davide wrote: > Hello world, >

[easybuild] foss + CUDA toolchain

2017-01-24 Thread Vanzo, Davide
Hello world, I really like the idea of using foss and intel toolchain as common toolchain with other sites. However since we also have GPU nodes on our cluster we would need a foss toolchain with CUDA. I know that there is goolfc already out there but that does not comply to the a/b release

Re: [easybuild] Successful builds fail when LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8

2017-01-24 Thread Robert Schmidt
I'm wrong about the encoding stuff. Maybe Kenneth can respond. There must be a different type of string in the list. I'll look around in the code to see if there is a standard way of handling it... On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:25 AM Robert Schmidt wrote: > Do you really need

Re: [easybuild] Successful builds fail when LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8

2017-01-24 Thread Robert Schmidt
Do you really need to upload the test report? If you need to share something just gist the build log. It is also clearly a bug and not too difficult to fix. I think you can just add a u to the beginning of '\n' so u'\n'.join(test_report) there must be a non-ascii string somewhere in there. Not

[easybuild] Successful builds fail when LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8

2017-01-24 Thread Maxime Boissonneault
Hi all, Even when a build is successful, if my LANG is set to fr_CA.UTF-8, Python fails with what appears to be a decoding error of some accent : == Results of the build can be found in the log file(s) /tmp/eb-_h4iDk/easybuild-Python-3.5.2-20170124.151206.yDGdP.log Traceback (most recent

Re: [easybuild] Intel TBB Apache 2.0 version

2017-01-24 Thread Maxime Boissonneault
No toolchain (or the dummy if you'ld rather). There's a binary distribution for Linux which does not depend on Intel. Maxime On 17-01-24 09:21, Robert Schmidt wrote: What toolchain do you intend to target? It would probably make sense to make a foss version of tbb. It does look like it

Re: [easybuild] Intel TBB Apache 2.0 version

2017-01-24 Thread Robert Schmidt
What toolchain do you intend to target? It would probably make sense to make a foss version of tbb. It does look like it would require a modification to the easyblock. There are probably some other places this would be useful too. On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:12 AM Maxime Boissonneault <

[easybuild] Intel TBB Apache 2.0 version

2017-01-24 Thread Maxime Boissonneault
Hi all, I need to install Intel TBB as a dependency for the newest version of Bowtie2. I see that the EB config calls for a licensed software. However, TBB is now available under Apache 2.0 : https://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/download#stable-releases I wonder, should a new easyblock