On 24/01/2017 16:56, Benjamin Evans wrote:
Davide,
Seems like a good idea to me. Would it make sense to build it on top
of the gcccuda toolchain? Maybe call it fosscuda to fit with several
of the other toolchains that include CUDA?
+1, it would make sense, but someone else would have
On 24/01/2017 16:31, Robert Schmidt wrote:
I'm wrong about the encoding stuff. Maybe Kenneth can respond. There
must be a different type of string in the list. I'll look around in
the code to see if there is a standard way of handling it...
These kind of bugs can be tricky to fix, but
On 24/01/2017 16:43, Maxime Boissonneault wrote:
On 17-01-24 10:25, Robert Schmidt wrote:
Do you really need to upload the test report? If you need to share
something just gist the build log.
Sorry ? I only posted the stack trace, not the test report itself ?
Rob mentioned the test
Hi David,
On 20/01/2017 17:17, David Ramírez wrote:
Hi
I used old Ifort (version 12). I need to compile Open-MPI for example
and another programs. I tried to edit some easyconfig files. However
does no work. I see toolchains. My question is. Can I use my local
compilers inside some files?
Hello EasyBuild experts,
currently I am working as intern in a small engineering company which is
accessing two clusters for their simulation and viz tasks (one remote cray
system, one smaller local Xeon cluster). My task is to examine to what
degree EasyBuild can simplify maintaining on both
Davide,
Seems like a good idea to me. Would it make sense to build it on top of
the gcccuda toolchain? Maybe call it fosscuda to fit with several of the
other toolchains that include CUDA?
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Vanzo, Davide wrote:
> Hello world,
>
Hello world,
I really like the idea of using foss and intel toolchain as common toolchain
with other sites. However since we also have GPU nodes on our cluster we would
need a foss toolchain with CUDA. I know that there is goolfc already out there
but that does not comply to the a/b release
I'm wrong about the encoding stuff. Maybe Kenneth can respond. There must
be a different type of string in the list. I'll look around in the code to
see if there is a standard way of handling it...
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:25 AM Robert Schmidt wrote:
> Do you really need
Do you really need to upload the test report? If you need to share
something just gist the build log.
It is also clearly a bug and not too difficult to fix. I think you can just
add a u to the beginning of '\n'
so u'\n'.join(test_report)
there must be a non-ascii string somewhere in there. Not
Hi all,
Even when a build is successful, if my LANG is set to fr_CA.UTF-8,
Python fails with what appears to be a decoding error of some accent :
== Results of the build can be found in the log file(s)
/tmp/eb-_h4iDk/easybuild-Python-3.5.2-20170124.151206.yDGdP.log
Traceback (most recent
No toolchain (or the dummy if you'ld rather). There's a binary
distribution for Linux which does not depend on Intel.
Maxime
On 17-01-24 09:21, Robert Schmidt wrote:
What toolchain do you intend to target?
It would probably make sense to make a foss version of tbb. It does
look like it
What toolchain do you intend to target?
It would probably make sense to make a foss version of tbb. It does look
like it would require a modification to the easyblock.
There are probably some other places this would be useful too.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:12 AM Maxime Boissonneault <
Hi all,
I need to install Intel TBB as a dependency for the newest version of
Bowtie2. I see that the EB config calls for a licensed software.
However, TBB is now available under Apache 2.0 :
https://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/download#stable-releases
I wonder, should a new easyblock
13 matches
Mail list logo