Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-03-04 Thread Pablo Escobar Lopez
s, > > Kenneth > > > > > > > /Ole > > > >> From: easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be > >> on behalf of Ole Holm Nielsen > >> > >> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 09:11 > >> To: easybuild@lists.ugent.be > >> Subject: Re:

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-26 Thread Ole Holm Nielsen
On 2/26/19 11:24 AM, Kenneth Hoste wrote: On 22/02/2019 14:40, Ole Holm Nielsen wrote: On 2/22/19 1:24 PM, Lars Viklund wrote: A system C and C++ compiler is documented as a required dependency of EasyBuild if you are to install toolchains with it:

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-26 Thread Kenneth Hoste
with sufficiently recent versions... regards, Kenneth /Ole From: easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be on behalf of Ole Holm Nielsen Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 09:11 To: easybuild@lists.ugent.be Subject: Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node) Hi

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-22 Thread Mikael Öhman
And, apparently I hadn't refreshed this window for 2 days so I just replied to an outdated message! Sorry for the noise / Mikael On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 4:32 PM Mikael Öhman wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > The server I installed from indeed had gcc-c++ installed, so it's > consistent with the error

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-22 Thread Mikael Öhman
Hi Olivier, The server I installed from indeed had gcc-c++ installed, so it's consistent with the error you see. I didn't get any of those lines at all in my build log (since I didn't get the error). To be honest, I'm a bit unsure about what system packages should come into play when

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-22 Thread Ole Holm Nielsen
: Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node) Hi Olivier, On 2/20/19 10:18 PM, Olivier Mattelaer wrote: I actually face the same issue. The actual error message is this one: configure: error: in `/usr/local/Software/build/lm3-w091/binutils/2.31.1/dummy

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-22 Thread Lars Viklund
@lists.ugent.be Subject: Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node) Hi Olivier, On 2/20/19 10:18 PM, Olivier Mattelaer wrote: > I actually face the same issue. > > The actual error message is this one: > > configure: error: in > `/usr/local/Softw

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-22 Thread Ole Holm Nielsen
Hi Olivier, On 2/20/19 10:18 PM, Olivier Mattelaer wrote: I actually face the same issue. The actual error message is this one: configure: error: in `/usr/local/Software/build/lm3-w091/binutils/2.31.1/dummy-/binutils-2.31.1/gold': configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-22 Thread Ole Holm Nielsen
Hi Olivier, Looking further for errors in the logfile I see the same as you point out: == 2019-02-20 14:02:32,930 build_log.py:251 INFO building... == 2019-02-20 14:02:32,930 easyblock.py:2616 INFO Starting build step == 2019-02-20 14:02:32,931 easyblock.py:2622 INFO Running method build_step

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-20 Thread Olivier Mattelaer
Hi Ole, Mikael, I actually face the same issue. The actual error message is this one: configure: error: in `/usr/local/Software/build/lm3-w091/binutils/2.31.1/dummy-/binutils-2.31.1/gold': configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check See `config.log' for more details yes

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-20 Thread Mikael Öhman
Hi Ole, That still isn't the error; there should be the actual line, doing whatever compilation or linking, that failed. They just tend to be somewhere in middle of the huge output from the make command (even worse with parallel builds). You can put the entire log in some pastebin and someone is

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-20 Thread Ole Holm Nielsen
Hi Åke, The make actually fails as shown below. There are hundreds of configure and checking lines above the lines I display, and the first make command fails as shown in the output. Can you suggest anything else to check? Are there issues with AVX512 on Skylake, and if so, how to work

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-20 Thread Ole Holm Nielsen
On 2/20/19 2:45 PM, Åke Sandgren wrote: What is the actual error? Look in /tmp/eb-dyNH9x/easybuild-binutils-2.31.1-20190220.140138.qdBpn.log It's: $ tail /tmp/eb-dyNH9x/easybuild-binutils-2.31.1-20190220.140138.qdBpn.log config.status: executing default commands make[1]: Leaving directory

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-20 Thread Alvarez, Damian
I have binutils 2.31.1 on Skylake. It has been compiled without avx512 support though. I am not sure if that could play a role. Damian On 20.02.19, 14:46, "easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be on behalf of Åke Sandgren" wrote: What is the actual error? Look in

Re: [easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-20 Thread Åke Sandgren
What is the actual error? Look in /tmp/eb-dyNH9x/easybuild-binutils-2.31.1-20190220.140138.qdBpn.log On 2/20/19 2:18 PM, Ole Holm Nielsen wrote: > I'm trying to build the foss-2019a toolchain with EB 3.8.1 on a new > Intel Skylake node (40 cores + hyperthreading = 80 cores) but it fails > in

[easybuild] Building foss-2019a fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb (Skylake node)

2019-02-20 Thread Ole Holm Nielsen
I'm trying to build the foss-2019a toolchain with EB 3.8.1 on a new Intel Skylake node (40 cores + hyperthreading = 80 cores) but it fails in binutils-2.31.1.eb as shown below. I've tried to increase some system limits, but that doesn't seem to help. My current limits are: $ ulimit -a core