On 20/12/2017 08:31, Åke Sandgren wrote:
On 12/20/2017 08:17 AM, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
On 11/12/2017 16:30, Erik Smeets wrote:
Hi,
The strict versioning scheme now is both a blessing and a curse: it's a
way of communicating that a particular combinations of versions worked,
but it does result
On 11/12/2017 16:30, Erik Smeets wrote:
Hi,
There are also a lot of dependencies to applications that in my
opinion don't need a specific toolchain, but just need to be
available. Maybe don't add these to a specific toolchain or version,
but a generally avaible toolchain (dummy?).
There's
Hi Erik,
Yes, this has been discussed a few times before and definitely many people
would like to see this feature but the implementation is the tricky part.
Having said that, the implementation may be getting more feasible. For
toolchain resolution we already have a search in place based on
Hi,
There are also a lot of dependencies to applications that in my opinion
don't need a specific toolchain, but just need to be available. Maybe don't
add these to a specific toolchain or version, but a generally avaible
toolchain (dummy?). Also, now dependencies are really strict on version,
It's fairly simple.
Use whatever is already available for the selected toolchain. Don't
forget to check the git develop branch and any pending PRs when deciding
on versions.
On 11/24/2017 10:16 AM, Joachim Hein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Because of interoperability of software, I see an increasing need
5 matches
Mail list logo
