Re: [ECOLOG-L] Fwd: CALL TO ACTION - Discovery Channel teaches viewers how to kill bats.

2010-05-29 Thread Derek Pursell
Wayne has a good idea here. Having some sort of organization that can vet educational programming for scientific accuracy and authenticity would help greatly to increase the quality and educational value of such programming. I think the core problem is that these organizations like Discovery,

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Religion Scientific Dogma Great Accomplishments

2010-05-19 Thread Derek Pursell
To develop Wayne's response further, I would speculate that many great human accomplishments are birthed from steady development followed by sudden insight. Some examples that come to mind are... Beethoven was said to stay up for days when composing, and supposedly generated some of his most

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Science and Religion Dogmatic conflict?

2010-05-18 Thread Derek Pursell
a new discussion.) On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Derek Pursell dep1...@yahoo.com wrote: That's fine Mr. Roper, it is nothing, haha! To continue with the topic at hand though, the principles of the person being their own judge on the matter and being able to explain to someone's self

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Science and Religion Dogmatic conflict?

2010-05-15 Thread Derek Pursell
Mr. Roper makes an excellent point here; the value of establishing that one should not have an opinion (interpretation: bias?) before studying or gaining further knowledge of a subject is invaluable to the pursuit of knowledge. This principle applies for scientific and non-scientific purposes.

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Science and Religion Dogmatic conflict? Re: [ECOLOG-L] evolution for non-scientists textbook

2010-05-14 Thread Derek Pursell
Science and religion are indeed compatible, providing that people do not use the ideas and methodologies of one to override or undermine the other. An open mind for a different view goes a long way, and as Aristotle said, It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without

Re: [ECOLOG-L] decline in education, comment on active learning

2010-01-26 Thread Derek Pursell
To clarify about the language I was using earlier, what I meant by passive learning was that this is learning where one observes but does not contribute to others learning (witnessing a lecture), while active learning is something like giving a presentation or answering questions or in some way

Re: [ECOLOG-L] decline in education, comment on active learning

2010-01-25 Thread Derek Pursell
As it pertains to passive vs. active teaching methods, I believe both forms of teaching are valuable tools. If the objective is to transfer a given amount of factual information, passive methods of learning seem the better tool. If the objective is to teach students how to think, how to

Re: [ECOLOG-L] now I've seen it all: Decline in education- student's perspective

2010-01-23 Thread Derek Pursell
A good friend of mine, an older gentleman who has worked as president for an environmental NGO in the northeast for years, put it to me in a particularly striking way. He said, and I am paraphrasing, In terms of education, the reality in America is that a lot of people are going to college who

Re: [ECOLOG-L] now I've seen it all

2010-01-18 Thread Derek Pursell
I agree with David's comment about the dubiousness of using standardized test scores as a measure of the success of learning. Speaking as an American student whom has been subjected to standardized tests for most of his academic life, there are primarily two things that taking these tests teach

[ECOLOG-L] Gallup Poll on Evolution and Human Thought Knowledge

2009-02-16 Thread Derek Pursell
Some thoughts of my own, and I will try to stay focused upon the topic: As someone with a scientific education, I don't think it is particularly surprising or illogical (I'll explain what I mean by that shortly) that so many people still reject the theories of evolution and natural selection,