I'm very glad to see the commitment of the North Americans in assume the =
guilt for them. Maybe I should alleviate my consciousness, but I'm not. =
Unlike most of them, I do not consider the CO2 emissions the only one or =
the major problem driven climate change.
I'm still concerned with habitat
increases.
Bill
On 12/1/07, Osmar Luiz Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just wondered what kind of people developed this
ecological footprint
quiz, because for me its seen biased and flawed.
Naïve, at best.
You said that first world kids will have larger
footprints that third world
kids
A third world view on childfree ideology.
Here in Brazil, anyone who decides to not have kids in an attempt to save
the world, will soon became frustrated in seeing uneducated and miserable
couples in slums having 6 or 7 or even 10 children. The decision is clearly
useless and is clear to me
Hello,
I've been out of this list for many years and signed it again two days ago.
I'm very glad to see that it shifted from mainly naive questions about
environmentalism to serious discussions about the science of ecology like
that exciting messages about the niche theory.
Back to the
trying to find rigid theoretical definitions.
apologizes for the english
Osmar Luiz Jr.
Brazil
- Original Message -
From: Warren W. Aney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: unoccupied niches and 'competitive
