...@cox.net; ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 6:04 AM
Subject: RE: [ECOLOG-L] fixing peer review - elegant new proposal and
petition - ideas
If people are forced to review just to acquire review credits when they have
no real interest in conducting the review
circulating.
WT
- Original Message - From: Robert Matlock
robert.matl...@csi.cuny.edu
To: Wayne Tyson landr...@cox.net; ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 6:04 AM
Subject: RE: [ECOLOG-L] fixing peer review - elegant new proposal and
petition - ideas
If people
These are some good ideas - we DEFINITELY need more INDEPENDENT research
jobs in science - this is a HUGE problem. I would start there before
deciding to reduce the number of PhD's earned. The problems science
solves will not go away, in general, so we will always need more
independent
I am strongly in favor of #2 rather than #1. Full disclosure will tend
to make reviewers nicer, but this is not always a good thing. I
believe that complete anonymity is the way to go.
Jane Shevtsov
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Aaron T. Dossey bugoc...@gmail.com wrote:
These are some good
be
revealing.
- Original Message -
From: Jane Shevtsov jane@gmail.com
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] fixing peer review - elegant new proposal and
petition - ideas
I am strongly in favor of #2 rather than #1. Full disclosure
Manoa
- Original Message -
From: Wayne Tyson landr...@cox.net
Date: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:53 pm
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] fixing peer review - elegant new proposal and petition
- ideas
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Ecolog:
I was initially inclined to agree with Shevtsov, then I
: Thursday, July 22, 2010 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] fixing peer review - elegant new proposal and
petition - ideas
These are some good ideas - we DEFINITELY need more INDEPENDENT research
jobs in science - this is a HUGE problem. I would start there before
deciding to reduce the number
