Re: [ECOLOG-L] Bigfoot footage in TX (gag me).

2013-02-18 Thread Nuno Negrões
Hello All

I agree completely with Wayne PS...that is why is time for researchers to
invest in science communication and have their own production :) There are
more and more researchers investing in learning video skills and use them
to spread their work.
Regards
Nuno

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Wayne Tyson landr...@cox.net wrote:

 Ok, what's your plan?

 WT

 PS: My wife got conned by a production company doing work for the
 Discovery Channel several years ago, thinking they were doing legitimate
 scientific journalism, and I got conned into shooting some video for them
 (for which I never got a cent). Never since and never again. That's our
 contribution--saying no to the production companies' requests for
 interviews and footage. Y'all may have noticed how they (used to) start off
 with some legitimate scientists sincerely believing that they were serving
 legitimate science education, but ended up being cut into a pseudoscience
 film. Some have repeated the error and some have refused to touch any kind
 of educational filmmaking, as the scientist has no control over the final
 outcome. How many people on this list have gotten taken by these
 smooth-talking production companies and have consented to be interviewed
 for what turned out to be something that they would never have consented to
 be a part of, had they known what the outcome would be in advance?


 - Original Message - From: malcolm McCallum 
 malcolm.mccallum@HERPCONBIO.**ORG malcolm.mccal...@herpconbio.org
 To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
 Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 7:20 AM
 Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Bigfoot footage in TX (gag me).


  Look, these folks are posing as researchers, sucking up soft money
 (yes, they are) to do this stuff, getting publicity on such channels
 as Discovery.  Now, when a bunch of yahoo charlatans start doing this
 sort of thing it degrades science by confusing the public about what
 is and is not science, who is and is not doing science, and what is
 and is not credible evidence.  When you degrade science in this manner
 it also interferes with all aspects of society because now logic is
 overcome with nonsense and the more nonsense is promoted as logic, the
 more people who ultimately start to think in illogical ways leading to
 poor decisions in all aspects of life, including politics and cast
 votes.  When illogical paths are taken in choosing candidates and
 casting votes, we end up with poor candidates who approve non-science
 and anti-science bills.

 THese little things do matter.   They are a virus, a plague on society
 that is every bit as damaging to its inner workings as political
 corruption.  They must be stomped out and scientists should come out
 in force and do so by very clearly, adamantly, directly and bluntly
 discounting their claims as junk (not junk science) and charlatanism.

 Malcolm

 On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Wayne Tyson landr...@cox.net wrote:

 Malcolm and Ecolog,

 Ignore them? (They want publicity.)

 When I was in the Forest Service in Northern California in the late
 fifties
 and early sixties (I've forgotten just when all the bigfoot hoopla at the
 Hoopa Reservation took place), my boss said the knew the guy who
 discovered the prints, and he said he was just the kind of nutcase that
 would come up with that kind of thing.

 Maybe the Texans are frustrated snipe-hunters?

 WT

 - Original Message - From: malcolm McCallum
 malcolm.mccallum@HERPCONBIO.**ORG malcolm.mccal...@herpconbio.org
 To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
 Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 6:11 PM

 Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Bigfoot footage in TX (gag me).


  I am very familiar with the Texas Bigfoot society folks having got in
 a tuff with them back in the early part of the decade.  They are total
 charlatans, see this video of a bigfoot from the twitter of Melba
 Ketchum.
 Is there anything we can do to discredit these folks with the public?
 We really need to address this and make it obvious they are literally
 making stuff up

  
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=khHSX3ZYaKIhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khHSX3ZYaKI

 --
 Malcolm L. McCallum
 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
 School of Biological Sciences
 University of Missouri at Kansas City

 Managing Editor,
 Herpetological Conservation and Biology

 Peer pressure is designed to contain anyone with a sense of drive -
 Allan Nation

 1880's: There's lots of good fish in the sea  W.S. Gilbert
 1990's:  Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss,
and pollution.
 2000:  Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction
  MAY help restore populations.
 2022: Soylent Green is People!

 The Seven Blunders of the World (Mohandas Gandhi)
 Wealth w/o work
 Pleasure w/o conscience
 Knowledge w/o character
 Commerce w/o morality
 Science w/o humanity
 Worship w/o sacrifice
 Politics w/o principle

 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
 attachments, is for 

[ECOLOG-L] Best Camera trap for amazon tropical forest

2012-11-28 Thread Nuno Negrões
Dear Colleagues

We are looking for the best camera trap (cost/benefice) for a project with
medium-large mammals in Amazonian tropical forest.
We will like to know your experiences and opinions.
Thanks
Nuno

-- 
Nuno Miguel Negrões Soares
Post-Doc Researcher
CESAM  Biology Department- Aveiro University
Natural History Museum Maputo- Mozambique
https://sites.google.com/site/unidadevidaselvagem/