Behalf Of Kirkland, Melissa J NWP
Sent: Thursday, 28 July, 2011 09:36
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Responses to Davis_etal..Nature article on invasive
species (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
As part of this debate, and I give nod to those that
ve is grounded.
WT
- Original Message -
From: "Kirkland, Melissa J NWP"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Responses to Davis_etal..Nature article on invasive
species (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
As part of this debate
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
As part of this debate, and I give nod to those that have declared the
original article as over-simplified, there are vast differences in the
impacts of "invasive" species that displace desirable species, and non-native
species that simply naturalize in a
Warren W. Aney
Tigard, Oregon
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Tyson [mailto:landr...@cox.net]
Sent: Thursday, 07 July, 2011 15:17
To: Warren W. Aney; ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Responses to Davis_etal..Nature article on invasive
species
Warren:
How about giving us a rundow
achieve a deep dynamic balance. Upset by
> > out-of-control human intervention can tilt against a healthy balance and
> > remains counter to maintenance of diversity.
> >
> > Cordially yours,
> > Geoff Patton, Ph.D. 2208 Parker Ave., Wheaton, MD 20902
> 301.221.953
How much of that invasion is "natural," and how much of it is the barred
owl taking advantage of our interference with the forest ecosystem,
Warren? It's hard to claim the western forests are wildernesses
"untouched" by the hand of man. Even patches of relatively unchanged
forests are affecte
2 301.221.9536
>
> --- On Wed, 7/6/11, Christopher M Moore wrote:
>
> From: Christopher M Moore
> Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Responses to Davis_etal..Nature article on invasive
> species
> To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
> Date: Wednesday, July 6, 2011, 6:30 PM
>
>
I know this is very trivial and adds nothing to the debate, but it
represents a stereotype of scientists as one dimensional. The blog
post from nature
(http://blog.nature.org/2011/06/invasive-species-fight-mark-davis-peter-kareiva/)
Opens with the line:"A famous person once observed that the sign
: [ECOLOG-L] Responses to Davis_etal..Nature article on invasive
species
My wife and I were discussing this topic the other day while hiking through
a Maryland park infested with Chinese garlic mustard and Japanese stilt
grass (among other invasives). We'd biked past slopes of kudzu and came
ons, and refutations coming out of this discussion.
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher M Moore"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Responses to Davis_etal..Nature article on invasive
species
Thanks for the post David.
As a newcomer
--- On Wed, 7/6/11, Christopher M Moore wrote:
From: Christopher M Moore
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Responses to Davis_etal..Nature article on invasive
species
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Date: Wednesday, July 6, 2011, 6:30 PM
Thanks for the post David.
As a newcomer to science (working on m
Thanks for the post David.
As a newcomer to science (working on my Ph.D.), there were some lingering
questions I had while reading Davis et al. and the responses: Is this how we
want to move forward as a science? What does it mean when we resort to
gathering signatures? Is this how our scienc
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:52:27 +
Forwarded from rom: Shyama Pagad
on Aliens-L list server
Correspondence Nature Vol 475 July 7 2011
--
Non-natives: 141 scientists object
We the undersigned feel that in advocating a
change in the environmental management of
introduced speci
13 matches
Mail list logo
