Re: If i need a supportet microcontroller with a new ethernet PHY...

2008-10-22 Thread Oliver Munz @ SNR
Atmel AT91SAM7X connected to a Micrel KSZ8041... Now i write a plattform variant named CYGPKG_HAL_ARM_AT91SAM7X_KSZ8041, but i'm not sure if this is the ecos-way to do it... Gary Thomas schrieb: Oliver Munz @ SNR wrote: ... then i have to rewrite the void hal_plf_eth_init(void). I can make

Re: If i need a supportet microcontroller with a new ethernet PHY...

2008-10-22 Thread Gary Thomas
Oliver Munz @ SNR wrote: > ... then i have to rewrite the void hal_plf_eth_init(void). I can make a > new platform-variant for this, but may be there is a better solution > like: make the hal_plf_eth_init PHY-dependent or make it configurable > defined as external or something like this... > > The

If i need a supportet microcontroller with a new ethernet PHY...

2008-10-22 Thread Oliver Munz @ SNR
... then i have to rewrite the void hal_plf_eth_init(void). I can make a new platform-variant for this, but may be there is a better solution like: make the hal_plf_eth_init PHY-dependent or make it configurable defined as external or something like this... The problem is, that every PHY has o