Hi Qber,
I'm porting eCos to an STM3210C-eval fake board. I have started with system
clocks until I've realized that all the job is already done by you! If you
dont mind, could you send me a patch?
Thanks a lot,
mlazcoz
qber_ wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> W dniu 2011-03-26 12:07:30 użytkownik Ilija Koc
On 28.03.2011 11:51, qb...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
> Hi
>
> W dniu 2011-03-26 12:07:30 użytkownik Ilija Kocho
> napisał:
>> On 23.03.2011 11:50, John Dallaway wrote:
>>> Hi Gian Maria
>>>
>>> Gian Maria wrote:
>>>
I'm porting eCos to STM3210C and I find a logical error on the
implementati
Hello again
W dniu 2011-03-28 12:47:07 użytkownik jerzy dyrda napisał:
> Hello all,
>
> On Monday 28 March 2011 11:51:45 qb...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
> (...)
> > There is only one thing left - the RCC differences. In RM there is a
> > seperate section about RCC config for CL. But at the first loo
Hello all,
On Monday 28 March 2011 11:51:45 qb...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
(...)
> There is only one thing left - the RCC differences. In RM there is a
> seperate section about RCC config for CL. But at the first look it seems
> that registers are compatible.
RCC registers are extended to support 2 e
Hi
W dniu 2011-03-26 12:07:30 użytkownik Ilija Kocho napisał:
> On 23.03.2011 11:50, John Dallaway wrote:
> > Hi Gian Maria
> >
> > Gian Maria wrote:
> >
> >> I'm porting eCos to STM3210C and I find a logical error on the
> >> implementation of CYGPKG_HAL_CORTEXM_STM32.
> >> CYGPKG_HAL_CORTEXM_ST
On 23.03.2011 11:50, John Dallaway wrote:
> Hi Gian Maria
>
> Gian Maria wrote:
>
>> I'm porting eCos to STM3210C and I find a logical error on the
>> implementation of CYGPKG_HAL_CORTEXM_STM32.
>> CYGPKG_HAL_CORTEXM_STM32 must be the base of all STM32 uP and so is not
>> correct for me to use
>>
>
Hi Gian Maria
Gian Maria wrote:
> I'm porting eCos to STM3210C and I find a logical error on the
> implementation of CYGPKG_HAL_CORTEXM_STM32.
> CYGPKG_HAL_CORTEXM_STM32 must be the base of all STM32 uP and so is not
> correct for me to use
>
> cdl_option CYGHWR_HAL_CORTEXM_STM32 {
>
Hello.
As it is in description the main diffrences in STM32F familly are on-board
flash and ram. So if you are using STM32F107VC you can use F103VC variant.
Between STM32F107VC and STM32103VD the main diffrences are in their periphelias:
3xSPI;2xI2S;2xI2C;3xUSART;2xUART;SDIO;USB;CAN