Hi Simon
Simon Kallweit wrote:
> John Dallaway wrote:
>
>> Excellent. I would like to push through with final review and get your
>> lwIP port checked in to CVS, replacing the existing lwIP 1.1.1 port. Is
>> lwip-20091027.tar.gz still current or do you have further changes?
>> Should I be compar
Hi Simon
Simon Kallweit wrote:
> John Dallaway wrote:
>
>> Excellent. I would like to push through with final review and get your
>> lwIP port checked in to CVS, replacing the existing lwIP 1.1.1 port. Is
>> lwip-20091027.tar.gz still current or do you have further changes?
>> Should I be compar
John Dallaway wrote:
Hi Simon
Simon Kallweit wrote:
One minor point: It would be very useful for the stack to report its
own IP address on the diagnostic channel.
I'll try to implement this. I guess you're mainly talking about DHCP IPs
right?
Yes, although it might sometimes also be helpful
Hi Simon
Simon Kallweit wrote:
One minor point: It would be very useful for the stack to report its
own IP address on the diagnostic channel.
>>>
>>> I'll try to implement this. I guess you're mainly talking about DHCP IPs
>>> right?
>>
>> Yes, although it might sometimes also be helpf
John Dallaway wrote:
I would recommend a "radio button" approach for mutually exclusive modes
which have associated source files. Something like:
cdl_interface CYGINT_LWIP_MODES {
display "Enabled lwIP modes"
no_define
requires 1 == CYGINT_LWIP_MODES
description "This interface
Hi Simon
Simon Kallweit wrote:
> John Dallaway wrote:
>> Hi Simon
>>
>> Simon Kallweit wrote:
>>
The lwIP CDL script currently builds ecos/sio.c unconditionally so
CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL is required even when both PPP and SLIP are disabled.
It would be good to compile ecos/sio.c via a CD
John Dallaway wrote:
Hi Simon
Simon Kallweit wrote:
The lwIP CDL script currently builds ecos/sio.c unconditionally so
CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL is required even when both PPP and SLIP are disabled.
It would be good to compile ecos/sio.c via a CDL option which is
"calculated { CYGPKG_LWIP_PPP || CYGPKG
Hi Simon
Simon Kallweit wrote:
>> The lwIP CDL script currently builds ecos/sio.c unconditionally so
>> CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL is required even when both PPP and SLIP are disabled.
>> It would be good to compile ecos/sio.c via a CDL option which is
>> "calculated { CYGPKG_LWIP_PPP || CYGPKG_LWIP_SLIP }
John Dallaway wrote:
Hi Simon
Simon Kallweit wrote:
Testing on real hardware would be especially useful. Also testing on
big-endian targets might reveal some issues, as I've only been testing
on little-endian platforms.
Using your sources from lwip-20090827.tar.gz, I was able to build and
ru
Hi Simon
Simon Kallweit wrote:
> Testing on real hardware would be especially useful. Also testing on
> big-endian targets might reveal some issues, as I've only been testing
> on little-endian platforms.
Using your sources from lwip-20090827.tar.gz, I was able to build and
run the httpd_simple
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 09:18:23AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
> In the meantime I have successfully committed my SLIP polling support to
> the lwip CVS, so it will be included in 1.4. I have also updated my port
> with these now official changes and did some testing. The new release:
>
> http
Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:38:42AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:08:20PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:41:13AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
Hi
I have done a new lwip test release with the follo
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:38:42AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
> Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:08:20PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:41:13AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
Hi
I have done a new lwip test release with the following c
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:38:42AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
> Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
>> I retried nc master/slave test with your template and suggested pbuf
>> values. For synthetic (I used tap interface) I got good results with
>> lwIP, but, for real target, nc test passed for 100% master load
Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:08:20PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:41:13AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
Hi
I have done a new lwip test release with the following changes:
* incorporated Sergei's patch (ctrl-c support)
* added an lwip_eth_simple
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:08:20PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:41:13AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have done a new lwip test release with the following changes:
> >
> > * incorporated Sergei's patch (ctrl-c support)
> > * added an lwip_eth_simple and
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:41:13AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have done a new lwip test release with the following changes:
>
> * incorporated Sergei's patch (ctrl-c support)
> * added an lwip_eth_simple and lwip_eth_sequential template
>
> The new test release can be downloaded from
Hi
I have done a new lwip test release with the following changes:
* incorporated Sergei's patch (ctrl-c support)
* added an lwip_eth_simple and lwip_eth_sequential template
The new test release can be downloaded from
http://download.westlicht.ch/lwip-20090825.tar.gz
To do synth tests do the
Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:43:36PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:12:02AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
Hi
If anyone volunteers, I'd be glad if you could test the current state of
the lwip 1.3.1 port. It has been updated with the latest changes
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:43:36PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:12:02AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > If anyone volunteers, I'd be glad if you could test the current state of
> > the lwip 1.3.1 port. It has been updated with the latest changes from
>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:12:02AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
> Hi
>
> If anyone volunteers, I'd be glad if you could test the current state of
> the lwip 1.3.1 port. It has been updated with the latest changes from
> the 1.3.1 release. I currently left in my changes for SLIP and PPP (see
>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:42 AM, John Dallaway wrote:
> Simon Kallweit wrote:
>
>> If anyone volunteers, I'd be glad if you could test the current state of
>> the lwip 1.3.1 port. It has been updated with the latest changes from
>> the 1.3.1 release. I currently left in my changes for SLIP and PPP
Simon Kallweit wrote:
> If anyone volunteers, I'd be glad if you could test the current state of
> the lwip 1.3.1 port. It has been updated with the latest changes from
> the 1.3.1 release. I currently left in my changes for SLIP and PPP (see
> my last mail for details), but this should not matter
Hi
If anyone volunteers, I'd be glad if you could test the current state of
the lwip 1.3.1 port. It has been updated with the latest changes from
the 1.3.1 release. I currently left in my changes for SLIP and PPP (see
my last mail for details), but this should not matter for testing. The
pack
24 matches
Mail list logo