On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 15:57, Pete Batard wrote:
>
> On 2019-02-15 14:39, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 11:07, Ard Biesheuvel
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 19:14, Leif Lindholm
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:47:36PM +, Pete Batard
On 2019-02-15 14:39, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 11:07, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 19:14, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:47:36PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
This is designed to be used on platforms where a a real RTC is not
available and
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 15:57, Pete Batard wrote:
>
> On 2019-02-15 14:39, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 11:07, Ard Biesheuvel
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 19:14, Leif Lindholm
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:47:36PM +, Pete Batard
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 11:07, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 19:14, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:47:36PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
> > > This is designed to be used on platforms where a a real RTC is not
> > > available and relies on an
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 19:14, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:47:36PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
> > This is designed to be used on platforms where a a real RTC is not
> > available and relies on an RtcEpochSeconds variable having been set or,
> > if that is not the case, falls
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 01:12:11AM +0100, Pete Batard wrote:
> Hi Leif,
>
> On 2019-02-12 19:14, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:47:36PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
> > > This is designed to be used on platforms where a a real RTC is not
> > > available and relies on an
Hi Leif,
On 2019-02-12 19:14, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:47:36PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
This is designed to be used on platforms where a a real RTC is not
available and relies on an RtcEpochSeconds variable having been set or,
if that is not the case, falls back to
Hi Philippe,
Thanks fort reviewing this patch, and apologies for the late reply.
On 2019-02-05 20:57, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Pete,
On 2/4/19 1:47 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
This is designed to be used on platforms where a a real RTC is not
available and relies on an RtcEpochSeconds
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:47:36PM +, Pete Batard wrote:
> This is designed to be used on platforms where a a real RTC is not
> available and relies on an RtcEpochSeconds variable having been set or,
> if that is not the case, falls back to using the epoch embedded at
> compilation time.
>
>
Hi Pete,
On 2/4/19 1:47 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> This is designed to be used on platforms where a a real RTC is not
> available and relies on an RtcEpochSeconds variable having been set or,
> if that is not the case, falls back to using the epoch embedded at
> compilation time.
>
> Note that, in
This is designed to be used on platforms where a a real RTC is not
available and relies on an RtcEpochSeconds variable having been set or,
if that is not the case, falls back to using the epoch embedded at
compilation time.
Note that, in order to keep things simple for the setting of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
