On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:06:51AM +, Tian, Feng wrote:
> Agree.
>
> How about naming it as UFS_TRD_OCS_INIT_VALUE?
>
> If there is no objection, I will help make this change and push
> these patches into EDKII trunk.
That sounds excellent to me, thanks!
/
Leif
> Series reviewed-by:
Agree.
How about naming it as UFS_TRD_OCS_INIT_VALUE?
If there is no objection, I will help make this change and push these patches
into EDKII trunk.
Series reviewed-by: Feng Tian
Thanks
Feng
-Original Message-
From: Leif Lindholm
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 08:22:58PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> The OCS value should be initiliazed as 0x0F according to UFS spec.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang
> ---
>
The OCS value should be initiliazed as 0x0F according to UFS spec.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang
---
MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ufs/UfsBlockIoPei/UfsHci.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git
4 matches
Mail list logo