On 11/25/15 1:34 AM, Jordan Justen wrote:
Also, why is Vlv2TbltDevicePkg 14MB, and more than 65% of that is
binaries?
We moved a large chunk of binaries out of BaseTools/Bin a while back,
and this seems like a similar situation. I think these binaries don't
belong in the EDK II source code
t; Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Vlv2TbltDevicePkg/GenBiosId binary
>
> On 11/24/15 3:03 PM, Jordan Justen wrote:
>
> > I wonder why this binary exists in EDK II without source code.
> >
> > I also notice that Vlv2TbltDevicePkg/GenBiosId is a 32-
David, Tim,
I wonder why this binary exists in EDK II without source code.
I also notice that Vlv2TbltDevicePkg/GenBiosId is a 32-bit ELF
executable. What if someone wanted to build Vlv2TbltDevicePkg on X64
and they didn't have 32-bit userspace available?
-Jordan
Yes, the GenBiosId is 32-bit ELF binary, because we need to support GCC build
on Linux 32bit system.
Best Regards,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Justen, Jordan L
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 6:04 AM
To: Wei, David; He, Tim
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject:
On 11/24/15 3:03 PM, Jordan Justen wrote:
I wonder why this binary exists in EDK II without source code.
I also notice that Vlv2TbltDevicePkg/GenBiosId is a 32-bit ELF
executable. What if someone wanted to build Vlv2TbltDevicePkg on X64
and they didn't have 32-bit userspace available?
I took
:30 AM
To: Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; Wei, David
<david@intel.com>; He, Tim <tim...@intel.com>
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] Vlv2TbltDevicePkg/GenBiosId binary
On 11/24/15 3:03 PM, Jordan Justen wrote:
> I wonder why this binary exi
6 matches
Mail list logo
