On 11/04/16 16:29, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 04/11/2016 16:22, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
What does this *KVM internal error. Suberror: 1* mean?
>> The key message is "emulation failure" -- it means that the processor
>> exits to the hypervisor (KVM) because it finds some code that it cannot
On 11/04/16 14:50, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 04/11/2016 14:28, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
>> I tried below way. But it does not help too much. It still takes more
>> than 1 minutes to boot with SMP=8.
>>
>> SendSmiIpiAllExcludingSelf ();
>> IoWrite8 (ICH9_APM_STS, DataPort== NULL ? 0 :
On 11/04/16 04:14, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> Mike
>
> You are right.
>
> After I turn on this, I saw all APs.
>
>
>
> However, the system becomes extremely slow. Intolerable.
>
>
>
> I suggest to add more description around below on why it is set to 0x01
> by default, and what is the impact
On 11/04/16 02:15, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> Thank you, Mike.
> Yes, I reproduced the issue and found out what is wrong. Here is detail:
>
> It seems OVMF never puts AP in SMM mode, even *before my patch series*.
> I rollback all my update and use e9d093.
>
> I add some debug message in
On 04/11/2016 16:22, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> > What does this *KVM internal error. Suberror: 1* mean?
> The key message is "emulation failure" -- it means that the processor
> exits to the hypervisor (KVM) because it finds some code that it cannot
> execute in guest mode natively, so the
n, Feng <feng.t...@intel.com>; Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>;
> edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Paolo
> Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Fan, Jeff <jeff....@intel.com>; Zeng, Star
> <star.z...@intel.com>
o Jiewen
>
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Laszlo
> Ersek
> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 5:43 AM
> To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen@intel.com>
> Cc: Tian, Feng <feng.t...@intel.com>; Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>;
> edk
On 04/11/2016 14:28, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> I tried below way. But it does not help too much. It still takes more
> than 1 minutes to boot with SMP=8.
>
> SendSmiIpiAllExcludingSelf ();
> IoWrite8 (ICH9_APM_STS, DataPort== NULL ? 0 : *DataPort);
> IoWrite8 (ICH9_APM_CNT, CommandPort ==
ichael D
<michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
Cc: Tian, Feng <feng.t...@intel.com>; Radim Kr?má? <rkrc...@redhat.com>;
edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Fan, Jeff <jeff@intel.com>; Zeng, Star
<star.z...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2] [P
<jiewen@intel.com>
Cc: Tian, Feng <feng.t...@intel.com>; Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>;
edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Paolo
Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Fan, Jeff <jeff@intel.com>; Zeng, Star
<star.z...@in
@intel.com>; Radim Kr?má? <rkrc...@redhat.com>;
edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Fan, Jeff
<jeff@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/6] Enable SMM page level protection.
Jiewen,
Here is the com
gt;;
Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
Cc: Tian, Feng <feng.t...@intel.com>; Radim Kr?má? <rkrc...@redhat.com>;
edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Fan, Jeff
<jeff@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [ed
an, Jeff
<jeff@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/6] Enable SMM page level protection.
Jiewen,
I remember now. Ovmf uses a different PCD setting for PcdCpuSmmSyncMode.
!if $(SMM_REQUIRE) == TRUE
gU
redhat.com>;
edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Fan, Jeff
<jeff@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/6] Enable SMM page level protection.
Thanks Mike.
I added "-cpu Nehalem -global ICH9-LPC.disable_s3=1", an
t;;
Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
Cc: Tian, Feng <feng.t...@intel.com>; Radim Kr?má? <rkrc...@redhat.com>;
edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Fan, Jeff
<jeff@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [e
..@redhat.com>;
edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Fan, Jeff
<jeff@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/6] Enable SMM page level protection.
Thank you, Mike.
Yes, I reproduced the issue and found out wha
c: Tian, Feng <feng.t...@intel.com>; Radim Kr?má? <rkrc...@redhat.com>;
edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Fan, Jeff
<jeff....@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/6] Enable SMM page level protection
...@intel.com>; Paolo
Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Fan, Jeff <jeff@intel.com>; Zeng, Star
<star.z...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/6] Enable SMM page level protection.
Hi Laszlo
I appreciate your help to validate the patch for me.
Yes, I am using a windows QEMU
;
edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Paolo
Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Fan, Jeff <jeff....@intel.com>; Zeng, Star
<star.z...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/6] Enable SMM page level protection.
On 11/03/16 07:53, Jiewen Yao wrote:
&g
On 11/03/16 07:53, Jiewen Yao wrote:
> This series patch enables SMM page level protection.
> Features are:
> 1) PiSmmCore reports SMM PE image code/data information
> in EdkiiPiSmmMemoryAttributeTable, if the SMM image is page aligned.
> 2) PiSmmCpu consumes EdkiiPiSmmMemoryAttributeTable
> and
I forget to mention - the whole series is also pushed to
https://github.com/jyao1/edk2, SmmProtection_V1 branch.
You can also review the code there.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Jiewen Yao
> Sent:
21 matches
Mail list logo