On 01/04/16 21:49, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 4 January 2016 at 19:27, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 12/24/15 14:03, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, compiling the DEBUG shell using the small code model is
>>> not sufficient in all cases to get a successful build when the
On 4 January 2016 at 19:27, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 12/24/15 14:03, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Unfortunately, compiling the DEBUG shell using the small code model is
>> not sufficient in all cases to get a successful build when the toolchain
>> defaults to the tiny code model.
On 12/24/15 14:03, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Unfortunately, compiling the DEBUG shell using the small code model is
> not sufficient in all cases to get a successful build when the toolchain
> defaults to the tiny code model. The reason is that not only the Shell binary
> itself should be built
Unfortunately, compiling the DEBUG shell using the small code model is
not sufficient in all cases to get a successful build when the toolchain
defaults to the tiny code model. The reason is that not only the Shell binary
itself should be built using the small code model, all Shell component
4 matches
Mail list logo