On 17 March 2017 at 12:35, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/17/17 13:11, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 17 March 2017 at 12:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 02/26/17 15:00, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 25 February 2017 at 04:04, Yao, Jiewen
On 03/17/17 13:11, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 17 March 2017 at 12:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 02/26/17 15:00, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 25 February 2017 at 04:04, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
Hi Ard
I agree with you on this enhancement.
I
On 17 March 2017 at 12:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/26/17 15:00, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 25 February 2017 at 04:04, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
>>> Hi Ard
>>> I agree with you on this enhancement.
>>>
>>> I prefer to adding the description as comment in the
On 02/26/17 15:00, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 25 February 2017 at 04:04, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
>> Hi Ard
>> I agree with you on this enhancement.
>>
>> I prefer to adding the description as comment in the code, so that people
>> can get clear picture when he/she reads the code.
On 25 February 2017 at 04:04, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> Hi Ard
> I agree with you on this enhancement.
>
> I prefer to adding the description as comment in the code, so that people
> can get clear picture when he/she reads the code.
>
> //
> // Instead of assuming that a PE/COFF
Hi Ard
I agree with you on this enhancement.
I prefer to adding the description as comment in the code, so that people can
get clear picture when he/she reads the code.
//
// Instead of assuming that a PE/COFF section of type EFI_IMAGE_SCN_CNT_CODE
// can always be mapped read-only, classify a
Instead of assuming that a PE/COFF section of type EFI_IMAGE_SCN_CNT_CODE
can always be mapped read-only, classify a section as a code section only
if it has the executable attribute set and the writable attribute cleared.
This adheres more closely to the PE/COFF spec, and avoids issues with
7 matches
Mail list logo