On 10/01/18 20:27, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 30/09/2018 00:23, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> The IA32 variant of InternalSyncCompareExchange64() is correct, but we can
>> simplify it. We don't need to load the lower 32 bits of ExchangeValue into
>> EBX in two steps (first into a general
On 30/09/2018 00:23, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> The IA32 variant of InternalSyncCompareExchange64() is correct, but we can
> simplify it. We don't need to load the lower 32 bits of ExchangeValue into
> EBX in two steps (first into a general register, then into EBX); we can
> ask GCC to populate EBX
The IA32 variant of InternalSyncCompareExchange64() is correct, but we can
simplify it. We don't need to load the lower 32 bits of ExchangeValue into
EBX in two steps (first into a general register, then into EBX); we can
ask GCC to populate EBX like that itself.
Cc: Liming Gao
Cc: Michael D
3 matches
Mail list logo