Re: [edk2] [RFC] EDK2 Staging Proposal 4th Draft

2016-04-11 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 04/11/16 20:23, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > Laszlo, > > I agree branch maintainer should be able to choose to rebase the branch as > needed. > Branch maintainers can also create V1, V2, ..., Vn versions of the feature > branch > as needed. > > Advertising features under development in either

Re: [edk2] [RFC] EDK2 Staging Proposal 4th Draft

2016-04-11 Thread Kinney, Michael D
ngefe...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [edk2] [RFC] EDK2 Staging Proposal 4th Draft > > On 04/07/16 19:27, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We left off with the 3rd draft of the edk2-staging proposal with some really > > good feedback. The consistent feedbac

Re: [edk2] [RFC] EDK2 Staging Proposal 4th Draft

2016-04-11 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 04/07/16 19:27, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > Hello, > > We left off with the 3rd draft of the edk2-staging proposal with some really > good feedback. The consistent feedback was to keep any process here simple > and to use features already available from github where it makes sense to do >

[edk2] [RFC] EDK2 Staging Proposal 4th Draft

2016-04-07 Thread Kinney, Michael D
Hello, We left off with the 3rd draft of the edk2-staging proposal with some really good feedback. The consistent feedback was to keep any process here simple and to use features already available from github where it makes sense to do so. The main purpose of the edk2-staging repo is to