Re: [edk2] MdePkg: Enable Xcode build of BaseLib without

Reviewed-by: Liming Gao > -Original Message- > From: af...@apple.com [mailto:af...@apple.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 3:18 PM > To: edk2-devel > Cc: Gao, Liming; Kinney, Michael D > Subject: MdePkg: Enable Xcode build of BaseLib without > > Please

Re: [edk2] MdePkg: Enable Xcode build of BaseLib without

This patch is committed at r18766. Thanks Liming From: af...@apple.com [mailto:af...@apple.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 11:31 PM To: Gao, Liming Cc: edk2-devel; Kinney, Michael D Subject: Re: MdePkg: Enable Xcode build of BaseLib without On Nov 10, 2015, at 12:22 AM, Gao, Liming

Re: [edk2] MdePkg: Enable Xcode build of BaseLib without

Liming; Kinney, Michael D; edk2-devel > Subject: Re: [edk2] MdePkg: Enable Xcode build of BaseLib without > > > > On Nov 10, 2015, at 8:06 PM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> > > wrote: > > > > On 2015-11-10 19:18:01, Andrew Fish wrote: > >

Re: [edk2] MdePkg: Enable Xcode build of BaseLib without

Liming, Andrew, Wasn't BUILDRULEORDER supposed to help with this? -Jordan On 2015-11-10 18:30:39, Gao, Liming wrote: > This patch is committed at r18766. > > Thanks > Liming > From: af...@apple.com [mailto:af...@apple.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 11:31 PM > To: Gao, Liming > Cc:

Re: [edk2] MdePkg: Enable Xcode build of BaseLib without

> On Nov 10, 2015, at 7:11 PM, Jordan Justen wrote: > > Liming, Andrew, > > Wasn't BUILDRULEORDER supposed to help with this? > I asked about that too? I was testing with XCODE5, so the BUILDRULEORDER should have been S s nasm? >git grep BUILDRULEORDER

[edk2] MdePkg: Enable Xcode build of BaseLib without

Please review. To build with Xcode without installing NASM I had to make the following change. ___ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel